We Need 30 Different Words for Censorship - CoinDesk

Which type of curren(t) do you want to see(cy)? An analysis of the intention behind bitcoin(s). Part 3

Part 1
Part 2
So I have been subbed to /bitcoin since it had less than two thousand subs but haven't posted there in years. I think I took a break from researching bitcoin to take a foray into the world of conspiracy around 2014 and only got back in to it around the beginning of 2017 but with a bit of sense of skepticism and cynicism about everything. I think I returned to /bitcoin around that time but there had been a rift that had emerged in the community between those that said that bitcoin was censoring any discussion around big blocks but then also just censorship in general. This lead to the formation of /btc which became the main spot for big blockers to gather to talk about protocol development. Following the fork of Bitcoin Cash and SegWit (BTC) in August 2017 the camps were further divided when the fence sitters were denied their SegWit2x compromise. Many from the fence sitters then deferred back to the incumbent bitcoin as citing muh network effect, liquidity, and hashpower while some who felt betrayed by the failure of getting S2X through went to support BCH for some attempt at on chain scaling rather than through pegged side chains or Lightning Network.
Bitcoin cash initially went with a modest doubling of the blocksize to 2MB but implemented some other features like a new more rapidly adjusting difficulty algorithm to protect themselves against hashpower fluctuations from the majority chain. In about July of that year I had seen what I potentially thought was someone LARPing on /biz/ but screencapped, that segwit2x which was scheduled for november 2017 would be called off and then hashpower would switch to BCH causing congestion and chain death spiral on BTC and BCH would pump massively. I was partial to the idea as the game theory and incentives on a big block bitcoin should attract miners. About a month after SegWit2x was indeed called off while the BTC blockchain was hugely congested, BCH went through a violent pump reaching 0.5 BTC/BCH on a European exchange called Kraken while it also pumped ridiculously on American exchange coinbase. Shortly afterwards the market took a giant dump all over those people who bought the top and it has since retraced to roughly 30:1 or so now.
After that pump though BCH kind of gained some bagholders I guess who started to learn the talking points presented by personalities like Roger Ver, Jihan Wu, Peter Rizun and Amaury Sechet. Craig S Wright by this time had been outed as Satoshi but had in 2016 publicly failed to convince the public with the cryptographic proof he provided. To which he later published the article I don't have the courage to prove I am the bitcoin creator. In essence this allowed many to disregard anything he offered to the crypto community though his company nChain was very much interested in providing the technical support to scale what he saw as the true implementation of bitcoin. Following debate around a set of planned protocol upgrades between a bitcoin node implementation by his company nChain and the developers of another client Bitcoin ABC (adjustable block cap), the two parties both dug their heels in and wouldn't compromise.
As it became clear that a fork was imminent there was a lot of vitriol tossed out towards Wright, another big billionaire backer Calvin Ayre and other personalities like Roger Ver and Jihan Wu. Craig's credibility was disregarded because of his failure to provide convincing cryptographic proof but still people who wanted to pursue the protocol upgrades that nChain were planning (as it best followed their interpretation of the bitcoin white paper) pursued his variant, while others who followed the socia consensus deferred to the positions of their personalities like Wu, Ver, and Sechet but even developers from Ethereum and other protocols chimed in to convince everyone that CSW is a fraud. This was referred to as the hash war and was the first time that the bitcoin protocol had been contentiously hard forked.

Hashpower is the CPU cycles you can commit to the Proof of Work function in bitcoin and the majority will generate the longest chain as they have the most proof of work. To win the contentious hard fork legitimately and make sure your chain will always be safe going forward you need to maintain your version of the blockchain with 51% of the hashpower on the network and force the other parties to continue to spend money on building a blockchain that is never going to be inserted in to the majority chain. As well as this you need to convince exchanges that you have the majority chain and have them feel safe to accept deposits and withdrawals so that they don't lose money in the chaos. This is how it would play out if both parties acted according to the rules of bitcoin and the Nakamoto Consensus.

There was a lot of shit talking between the two parties on social media with Craig Wright making a number of claims such as "you split, we bankrupt you" "I don't care if there is no ability to move coins to an exchange for a year" and other such warnings not to engage in foul play.. To explain this aftermath is quite tedious so It might be better to defer to this video for the in depth analysis but basically Roger Ver had to rent hashpower that was supposed to be mining BTC from his mining farm bitcoin.com, Jihan Wu did the same from his Bitmain Mining Farm which was a violation of his fiduciary duty as the CEO of a company preparing for an IPO. In this video of a livestream during the hashwar where Andreas Brekken admits to basically colluding with exchange owners like Coinbase, Kraken (exchange Roger Ver invested in), Bitfinex and others to release a patched ABC client to the exchanges and introducing "checkpoints" in to the BCH blockchain (which he even says is arguably "centralisation") in order to prevent deep reorgs of the BCH blockchain.
>"We knew we were going to win in 30 mins we had the victory because of these checkpoints that we released to a cartel of friendly businesses in a patch so then we just sat around drinking beers all day".
By releasing a patched client that has code in it to prevent deep reorgs by having the client refer to a checkpoint from a block mined by someone who supported BCHABC if another group of hash power was to try to insert a new chain history, this cartel of exchanges and mining farm operators conspired in private to change the nature of the bitcoin protocol and Nakamoto Consensus. Since the fork there have been a number of other BCH clients that have come up that require funding and have their own ideas about what things to implement on the BCH chain. What began to emerge was actually not necessarily an intention of scaling bitcoin but rather to implement Schnorr signatures to obfuscate transactions and to date the ABC client still has a default blocksize of 2MB but advertised as 16MB.
What this demonstrates for BCH is that through the collusion, the cartel can immediately get a favourable outcome from the developers to keep their businesses secure and from the personalities/developers to work on obfuscating records of transactions on the chain rather than scaling their protocol. After the SegWit fork, many from the BCH camp alleged that through the funding to Blockstream from AXA and groups that tied to the Bilderbergs, Blockstream would be beholden to the legacy banking and would be a spoke and hub centralised model, so naturally many of the "down with central banks anarcho capitalist types" had gathered in the BCH community. Through these sympathies it seems that people have been susceptible to being sold things like coin mixing and obfuscation with developers offering their opinions about how money needs to be anonymous to stop the evil government and central banks despite ideas like Mises’ Regression Theorem, which claims that in order for something to be money in the most proper sense, it must be traceable to an originally non-monetary barter commodity such as gold.
What this suggests is that there is an underlying intent from the people that have mechanisms to exert their will upon the protocol of bitcoin and that if obfuscation is their first priority rather than working on creating a scalable platform, this demonstrates that they don't wish to actually be global money but more so something that makes it easier to move money that you don't want seen. Roger Ver has often expressed sentiments of injustice about the treatment of Silk Road found Ross Ulbricht and donated a large amount of money to a fund for his defence. I initially got in to bitcoin seeking out the Silk Road and though I only wanted to test it to buy small quantities of mdma, lsd, and mescaline back in 2011 there was all sorts of criminal activity on there like scam manuals, counterfeits, ID, Credit Card info, and other darknet markets like armoury were selling pretty crazy weapons. It has been alleged by Craig Wright that in his capacity as a digital forensics expert he was involved with tracing bitcoin that was used to fund the trafficking of 12-16 year olds on the silk road. There have been attempts at debunking such claims by saying that silk road was moderated for such stuff by Ulbricht and others, but one only has to take a look in to the premise of pizza gate to understand that there it may be possible to hide in plain site with certain code words for utilising the market services and escrow of websites like the silk road. The recent pedo bust from South Korea demonstrates the importance of being able to track bitcoin transactions and if the first thing BCH wanted to do after separating itself from Satoshi's Vision and running on developer and cartel agendas was to implement obfuscation methods, this type of criminal activity will only proliferate.
Questions one must ask oneself then are things like why do they want this first? Are some of these developers, personalities and cartel businesses sitting on coins that they know are tarnished from the silk road and want to implement obfuscation practices so they can actually cash in some of the value they are unable to access? Merchants from the silk road 1 are still being caught even as recently as this year when they attempted to move coins that were known to have moved through the silk road. Chain analytics are only becoming more and more powerful and the records can never be changed under the original bitcoin protocol but with developer induced protocol changes like Schnorr signatures, and coinjoin it may be possible to start laundering these coins out in to circulation. I must admit with the cynicism I had towards government and law enforcement and my enjoying controlled substances occasionally I was sympathetic to Ross and donated to his legal fund back in the day and for many years claimed that I wouldn't pay my taxes when I wanted to cash out of bitcoin. I think many people in the space possess this same kind of mentality and subsequently can be preyed upon by people who wish to do much more in the obfuscation than dodge tax and party.
Another interesting observation is that despite the fact that btc spun off as a result of censorship around big block scaling on bitcoin, that subreddit itself has engaged in plenty of censorship for basically anyone who wants to discuss the ideas presented by Dr Craig Wright on that sub. When I posted my part 2 of this series in there a week ago I was immediately met with intense negativity and ad hominems so as to discourage others from reading the submission and my post history was immediately throttled to 1 comment every 10 mins. This is not quite as bad as cryptocurrency where my post made it through the new queue to gather some upvotes and a discussion started but I was immediately banned from that sub for 7 days for reason "Content standards - you're making accusations based on no evidence just a dump of links that do nothing to justify your claims except maybe trustnodes link (which has posted fabricated information about this subreddit mods) and a Reddit post. Keep the conspiracy theories in /conspiracy" My post was also kept at zero in bitcoin and conspiracy so technically btc was the least censored besides C_S_T.
In addition to the throttling I was also flagged by the u/BsvAlertBot which says whether or not a user has a questionable amount of activity in BSV subreddits and then a break down of your percentages. This was done in response to combat the "toxic trolls" of BSV but within bitcoincashSV there are many users that have migrated from what was originally supposed to be a uncensored subreddit to discuss bitcoin and many such as u/cryptacritic17 has have switched sides after having been made to essentially DOXX themselves in btc to prove that they aren't a toxic troll for raising criticisms of the way certain things are handled within that coin and development groups. Other prominent users such as u/jim-btc have been banned for impersonating another user which was in actual fact himself and he has uploaded evidence of him being in control of said account to the blockchain. Mod Log, Mod Damage Control, Mod Narrative BTFO. Interestingly in the comments on the picture uploaded to the blockchain you can see the spin to call him an SV shill when in actual fact he is just an OG bitcoiner that wanted bitcoin to scale as per the whitepaper.
What is essentially going on in the Bitcoin space is that there is a battle of the protocols and a battle for social consensus. The incumbent BTC has majority of the attention and awareness as it is being backed by legacy banking and finance with In-Q-Tel and AXA funding blockstream as well as Epstein associates and MIT, but in the power vaccum that presented itself as to who would steward the big block variant, a posse of cryptoanarchists have gained control of the social media forums and attempted to exert their will upon what should essentially be a Set In Stone Protocol to create something that facilitates their economic activity (such as selling explosives online)) while attempting to leverage their position as moderators who control the social forum to spin their actions as something different (note memorydealers is Roger Ver). For all his tears for the children killed in wars, it seems that what cryptoanarchists such as u/memorydealers want is to delist/shut down governments and they will go to any efforts such as censorship to make sure that it is their implementation of bitcoin that will do that. Are we really going to have a better world with people easier able to hide transactions/launder money?
Because of this power vacuum there also exists a number of different development groups but what is emerging now is that they are struggling for money to fund their development. The main engineering is done by self professed benevolent dictator Amaury Sechet (deadalnix) who in leaked telegram screen caps appears to be losing it as funding for development has dried up and money raised in an anarchist fashion wasn't compliant with laws around fundraising sources and FVNI (development society that manages BCH development and these donations) is run by known scammer David R Allen. David was founder of 2014 Israeli ICO Getgems (GEMZ) that scammed investors out of more than 2500 Bitcoins. The SV supported sky-lark who released this information has since deleted all their accounts but other users have claimed that sky-lark was sent personal details about themselves and pictures of their loved ones and subsequently deleted all their social media accounts afterwards.
There are other shifty behaviours like hiring Japanese influencers to shill their coin, recruiting a Hayden Otto that up until 2018 was shilling Pascal Coin to become a major ambassador for BCH in the Australian city of Townsville. Townsville was claimed to be BCH city hosting a BCH conference there and claiming loads of adoption, but at the conference itself their idea of demonstrating adoption was handing a Point of Sale device to the bar to accept bitcoin payments but Otto actually just putting his credit card behind the bar to settle and he would keep the BCH that everyone paid. In the lead up to the conference the second top moderator of btc was added to the moderators of townsville to shill their coin but has ended up with the townsville subreddit wanting to ban all bitcoin talk from the subreddit.
Many of the BCH developers are now infighting as funding dries up and they find themselves floundering with no vision of how to achieve scale or get actual real world adoption. Amaury has recently accused Peter Rizun of propagandising, told multiple users in the telegram to fuck off and from all accounts appears to be a malignant narcissist incapable of maintaining any kind of healthy relationship with people he is supposed to be working with. Peter Rizun has begun lurking in bitcoincashSV and recognising some of the ideas coming from BSV as having merit while Roger has started to distance himself from the creation of BCH. Interestingly at a point early in the BCH history Roger believed Dr Craig Wright was Satoshi, but once CSW wouldn't go along with their planned road map and revealed the fact he had patents on blockchain technology and wanted to go down a path that worked with Law, Roger retracted that statement and said he was tricked by Craig. He joined in on the faketoshi campaign and has been attempted to be sued by Dr Wright for libel in the UK to which Roger refused to engage citing grounds of jurisdiction. Ironically this avoidance of Roger to meet Dr Wright in court to defend his claims can be seen as the very argument against justice being served by private courts under an anarchocapitalist paradigm with essentially someone with resources simply being able to either flee a private court's jurisdiction or engage a team of lawyers that can bury any chances of an everyday person being able to get justice.
There is much more going on with the BCH drama that can be explained in a single post but it is clear that some of the major personalities in the project are very much interested in having their ideals projected on to the technical implementation of the bitcoin protocol and have no qualms spouting rhetoric around the anti-censorship qualities of bitcoin/BCH while at the same time employing significant censorship on their social media forums to control what people are exposed to and getting rid of anyone who challenges their vision. I posit that were this coin to become a success, these "benevolent dictators" as they put it would love their new found positions of wealth/dominance yet if their behaviour to get there is anything to go by, would demonstrate the same power tripping practices of censorship, weasel acts, misleading people about adoption statistics and curating of the narrative. When the hashrate from Rogers bitcoin.com minging operation on BCH dropped dramatically and a lot of empty blocks were being mined, his employer and 2IC moderator u/BitcoinXio (who stepped in to replace roger as CEO) was in the sub informing everyone it was simply variance that was the reason when only a few days later it was revealed that they had reduced their hash power significantly. This is not appropriate behaviour for one of the primary enterprises engaged in stewarding BCH and encouraging adoption nor is the inability to be accountable for such dishonest practices as well. It seems bitcoin.com treats btc as their own personal spam page where Roger can ask for donations despite it being against the sub rules and spin/ban any challenge to the narrative they seek to create.
Let's see how the censorship goes as I post this around a few of the same places as the last piece. Stay tuned for the next write up where I take a deep dive in to the coin that everyone doesn't want you to know about.
submitted by whipnil to C_S_T [link] [comments]

Proposed Statement Of Work (SOW) For PIVX Blockchain Wallet Tutorial Campaign

Date: February 11, 2019
Client’s Name: PIVX
Project Name: PIVX Blockchain Wallet Tutorial Campaign
Representatives For Each Cryptocurrency Project: PIVX Community
Representatives For www.Cryptocurrency.Market:
Denni Lovejoy, Software Tutorial Specialist
https://twitter.com/DenniLovejoy

I. Summary

Currently there are over 2,000 cryptocurrency projects listed on coinmarketcap.com. Many of these cryptocurrency projects have their own official “decentralized wallets”, use recommended third-party wallets or are in the process of developing their wallet software.
For example, the PIVX community created the PIVX QT Wallet.
Many newcomers entering the crypto market will not be computer or software savvy and will not properly set up, protect and secure their cryptocurrency wallets. Crypto projects such as PIVX will need Blockchain Tutorials for the PIVX Wallet to help new users understand how to use the wallet correctly.
The goal of this proposal is to obtain funding to create:
  1. Create a set of PIVX tutorials to help educate the public on how to use the the PIVX wallet and PIVX Central account in a step by step user friendly way. This set of tutorials will include:

II. Introduction

My name is Denni Lovejoy, I am a Blockchain Tutorial Specialist at www.Cryptocurrency.Market and you can view the quality of my past blockchain tutorials here:
Blockchain Tutorial Playlist
Blockchain Tutorial #41 - How To Setup A PIVX Wallet
I started creating blockchain tutorials to help newbies avoid getting hacked by bad actors in the crypto community. I chose to work with Tai Zen & Leon Fu Dot Com’s www.Cryptocurrency.Market channel because they were the 1st and only channel on the internet back in early 2013 that I found to be talking about trading and investing in bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. For example, they were the only channel that I know of to recommend investing in Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Stratis, Monero, Decred, NXT, Antshares, etc. when everyone else was afraid to do so. These coins all turned out to be huge winners.
I learned from the www.Cryptocurrency.Market channel that the #1 most important thing in cryptocurrencies is to survive. Unfortunately, many people who have bought cryptocurrencies lost them because of a lack of security, privacy and formal education on how to use their digital wallets correctly. The lack of blockchain tutorials amongst all cryptocurrencies is why I started my Blockchain Tutorial playlist on the Cryptocurrency Market channel. I believe uneducated newbies in the crypto community who do not understand what it takes to secure, protect and use their digital wallets will mistakenly leave their crypto on exchanges which is subject to being hacked or stolen and will not back up their private keys.
I have been monitoring the digital wallet space for quite some time now and I have chosen to associate my brand/ reputation & seek funding from the PIVX community for due to the project’s a) professionalism b) software engineering/technical abilities and most importantly c) a working privacy cryptocurrency and lastly d) the PIVX team has working decentralized wallets located on https://pivx.org/wallet/.
For the above reasons and the fact that I am more comfortable working with people I have personally met in person, I RESPECTFULLY submit this formal proposal to the PIVX community to request funding for myself to create an ambitious, 3rd party, independent, unbiased blockchain tutorials to educate the public on how to use the PIVX wallet and PIVX Central account correctly.

III. Objectives

To create a series of tutorial videos to:
  1. Educate the public on how to setup and use the PIVX wallet with a set of user friendly Blockchain Tutorials.
  2. Educate the public on how to set up a PIVX Central account and make a PIVX proposal.
  3. Educate the public on how to avoid common mistakes and pitfalls in key parts of the tutorials.

IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables

TUTORIAL 1: How To Set Up & Use The PIVX QT Wallet ($500) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will help viewers understand the initial process on how to download and install the PIVX QT wallet.
  2. Explain how to send and receive PIVX on the PIVX wallet.
  3. Explain how to backup, protect and update the PIVX wallet.
TUTORIAL 2: How to Set Up The Deterministic zPIV Wallet & Stake zPIV ($500) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will demonstrate how to set up a zPIV wallet and stake zPIV.
TUTORIAL 3: How To Make A PIVX Central Account, Upvote/ Downvote, Comment & Make a PIVX Proposal ($500) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will demonstrate how to make a PIVX Central account, show users how to upvote/ downvote and comment on the proposals.
  2. In this phase, I will provide the step by step details on how to make a PIVX Proposal.

V. Pricing & Terms

If you are interested in having me create the video tutorials mentioned in Section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables for your crypto project the cost will be as follows:
  1. I respectfully request $1,500 worth of PIVX for me to complete the section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables.
  2. The grand total cost of section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables = $1,550. (Includes Proposal Submission Fee)
  3. The estimated completion time for this entire proposal: 10 Hours x 4 Videos = 40 Hours x $37.5 USD/hour = $1,500 USD for Content Creation. This proposed schedule is to do this work in under 1 month allowing me to create 1 tutorial per week.
  4. Payment will be paid in PIVX (PIVX) by a PIVX Representative to me and will be processed after all 3 tutorials are accepted by the PIVX community. I will email a PIVX Representative an invoice with the details.
  5. I will include 1 revision per video.

VI. Conditions

  1. The tutorials will be hosted on the PIVX YouTube channel or any other official platform and not hosted anywhere else.
  2. I will get all my basic questions answered on PIVX support channels.
  3. I will state in the videos that I’m being sponsored by the PIVX Community anywhere that is deemed appropriate.
  4. PIVX will own the copyrights to the content created in this SOW and the PIVX Project has the right to use the content without asking me for permission.
  5. Videos will follow the PIVX design guidelines.
  6. Videos will be reviewed for accuracy by representatives of the PIVX community before being released to the public.
I am submitting this first draft of my proposed Statement Of Work (SOW) to invite feedback and commentary from the PIVX community.


The following are questions are for PIVX to consider and are not part of the SOW.

Statement Of Work (SOW) FAQ:
1. What is Denni Lovejoy’s big picture approach to help educate and promote PIVX to the public?
This entire SOW is based on the premise that PIVX is sponsoring me to do a series of educational/ tutorial style videos of the cryptocurrency governance coin sector.
2. Why are you taking a tutorial-based style approach to the videos?
The reason for this approach is to help viewers AVOID any mistakes they may make while going through ANY of the processes associated with using PIVX software.
3. Will you follow the PIVX design guidelines and have consistent screen-design intro/ outros?
Yes, I plan to use consistent screen-design and leverage anything additional the PIVX design and support team can offer me including intro, outros, disclaimers, ideas, etc. I will be following the guidelines found on https://github.com/PIVX-Project/Official-PIVX-Graphics.
4. Do you plan to publish the videos on the Youtube channel of your company or will they go into the official PIVX Youtube channel?
No, I do not plan to publish the videos on our 'Cryptocurrency Market' YouTube channel which has over 26,000 subscribers and over 700 videos. PIVX will have all the rights to the videos and will not be hosted elsewhere.
5. What is your target reach expectations and how do you want to keep the videos up-to-date if something changes in the GUI/software?
I do not plan on doing any advertising or marketing for the tutorials and will let the PIVX PR marketing team strategize that. I can speak with the PR team as needed, but my proposal is to create video content only suggested by the community.
I will give 1 revision per video if any of the videos need updating.
6. Did the other cryptocurrency projects you made video tutorials for also pay for their production?
No. My approach has been to create 66 blockchain tutorials for free first, to then leverage this work portfolio as my Proof-Of-Skill so that I can approach projects like PIVX with my proposal.
7. After watching your videos on youtube the production does not feel in step with our current educational videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaMrpvQ0yJ_xFLGwNoDzfT6Wr0XHpyr1R
I can adapt to the current style of educational videos listed on the PIVX Class channel. The main differences I can adjust to are: a) include background music during the intro and outro b) use themed transitions and text pop ups. If this is what the community prefers, let me know. However, I can add one element to the tutorials for consideration. I can record my face while guiding viewers through the tutorial to offer a more human feel as if I'm holding your hand or you're looking over my shoulders in every step of the process.
Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions about my proposal.
submitted by DenniLovejoy to pivx [link] [comments]

A recap of Mr. Yin Xiangyu's online speech

A recap of Mr. Yin Xiangyu's online speech
https://preview.redd.it/52f3q9x48p531.jpg?width=1920&format=pjpg&auto=webp&s=1bc3170485017be6cfdef7fe007305db2041aff4

Hello, I am Yin Xiangyu, or you could call me Freddy, head of INT Chain China. Before today’s topics, let me introduce myself first.
Since 2003, I started my career as an IoT developer, and I participate in several IoT projects. Then, I started my own business, such as an e-commerce website, online traveling, big data websites, IoT printer controlled by WeChat. In 2013, I first met bitcoin and blockchain, when Ethereum came out in 2015 I thought blockchain could solve many problems in IoT. So we started the INT project with our team members from such as Huawei, CAS, Tencent, and Microsoft.

1, Technology

In today’s topics, I will talk about three pillars of INT Chain, technology, application ecosystem, and community.
In January 2019, even it was a cold winter, Bitcoin fell to $3000, We still launched the INT Chain mainnet, because we know we have so many objects to achieve.
Up to now, our mainnet has been running for nearly half a year, in the meantime we made much remarkable development. This August INT chain New testnet will be launched.
It has many exciting features.
First, let me introduce its high-performance feature. We optimize the P2P, network protocol, and New INT Chain 4.0 uses IPBFT consensus, it will increase the confirmation speed to 1 second. That is 10 times faster than now.
Second, a new smart contract will be released, it will fully compatible with EVM and WASM, it supports most developing languages. More friendly for developing INT DApp.
I want to emphasize the most important principle when we design smart contracts– Security First. To avoid security problems, we have made the innovative design and made some standard design, just like the design principle of Wave language published by Facebook.
Third, We have also got a lot of progress in sub-chain, cross-chain and privacy protection.
Except these features, for a more secure and decentralized system. We will make some adjustments in the number of nodes, the entry requirement, and reward rules. We will keep improving in the future. Please pay more attention to our official media.
I want to introduce the Titan Plan. While doing our developing work, we are also promoting the research of blockchain basic theory and exploring the future business model.
20 years ago,no one knew the internet would change our lives so much. In China, we now don’t need to take a wallet, just one smartphone is enough. Also, we don’t know after 10 years, how IoT, 5G, AI, and blockchain will change our lives. So we launched the Titan plan. Up to now, we have received more than 20 research works, we hope more and more teachers/students and engineers will join the plan.

2, Application ecosystem

INT has always taken the engineering principle to develop INT, and then I will introduce our work in industry application, INT wallet ecosystem and terminal products.
As you know, INT has provided blockchain solutions for many government and corporation. Just recently, we signed a traceability project for chicken farming. Meanwhile, more projects are in business negotiation, including explosives traceability Systems, camera work-proof systems in more prisons.
China has officially launched 5G, and the global 5G development will be faster and faster. We and our partners, such as China Telecom, Huawei, and ZTE, will together get more projects in industrial manufacturing 4.0, smart city, smart prison, etc. Of course, these projects are not easily implemented, but they will provide a lot of help for the development of INT.
For the product for consumers, we continue to update our blockchain-router, we wish it will become the control center of IoT devices at home. We will launch the vehicles OBD device in two months. We are also working with partners to consider releasing a healthy product for consumers.
The INT wallet will be officially released soon. Its name is Smart Wallet. For the first time, its name and logo are chosen by community members. Smart Wallet is not only a wallet but an important entrance of the INT eco-system.
Smart wallet version 1.0 will have some basic functions, such as transaction, staking, voting, unstaking, and transaction record. We will continue to optimize the wallet system. In the future, with INT developers, we will develop applications, staking economy, charity, etc. in IoT.
Before the launch of Smart Wallet, we did a lot of security testing, and with our security partner, Slow Mist, we launched a bug bounty plan. The process of wallet signing only been executed localhost, it can protect users from private key leakage.
There are so many breakthroughs in 5G, edge computing, AI, and big data technologies in recent years, It will boost IoT blockchain and the machine economy will become a reality.
To promote the development of the IoT blockchain, we will invest more than 1 million dollars and extra token to promote INT’s applications, this is a long-term process and we look forward to more partners.

3, Community

The last pillar, I’d like to talk about our community. Without the support of the community, we will not have today’s result. Currently, INT has more than one hundred thousand users and nearly 40,000 overseas users from France, Germany, South Korea, Thailand, Singapore, Australia, and other countries. I have seen INT videos produced by community members. Thanks for your great work!
I want to talk about our community partner plan, INT looks forward to a more international community, we promote the development of INT together just like a team.
This plan has gotten a good result, In addition to 12 new Chinese communities, we have five new community partners in French, German, Spanish and Dutch. Our French community partners have released the French version of the INT video, we wish there are more partners of different languages to join us.
We know that our capability is limited. As more and more community members participate in INT development, ultimately we hope that INT can be led by our community, this year we will take out 150 million INT held by INT Foundation, and hand it over to a special management committee, we are drafting the committee’s proposal collection document.
Let me report the recent INT business development, we have established cooperation with some good IoT corporations and blockchain projects, also We have passed the review of one large exchanges, at right time, we will be listed.
Time flies very fast, it has been more than an hour, I am so happy can share INT with you,
Chinese Saying: Taking a step every day will reach a thousand miles away.
Thank you all, looking forward to the next meeting.

—INT Chain Foundation
submitted by INTCHAIN to INT_Chain [link] [comments]

Proposed Statement Of Work (SOW) For Decred Blockchain Wallet Tutorial Campaign

Date: February 05, 2019
Client’s Names: Decred
Project Name: Decred Blockchain Wallet Tutorial Campaign
Representatives For Each Cryptocurrency Project: Politeia For Decred Community
Representatives For www.Cryptocurrency.Market:
Denni Lovejoy, Software Tutorial Specialist
https://twitter.com/DenniLovejoy

I. Summary

Currently there are over 2,000 cryptocurrency projects listed on coinmarketcap.com. Many of these cryptocurrency projects have their own official “decentralized wallets”, use recommended third-party wallets or are in the process of developing their wallet software.
For example, the Decred project created the Decrediton Wallet.
Many newcomers entering the crypto market will not be computer or software savvy and will not properly set up, protect, and secure their cryptocurrency wallets. Crypto projects such as Decred will need Blockchain Tutorials for the Decrediton Wallet to help new users understand how to use the wallet correctly.
The goal of this proposal is to obtain funding to create:
  1. Create a set of Decred tutorials to help educate the public on how to use the the Decrediton wallet and Politeia account in a step by step user friendly way. This set of tutorials will include:

II. Introduction

My name is Denni Lovejoy, I am a Blockchain Tutorial Specialist at www.Cryptocurrency.Market and you can view the quality of my past blockchain tutorials here:
Blockchain Tutorial Playlist
I started creating blockchain tutorials to help newbies avoid getting hacked by bad actors in the crypto community. I chose to work with Tai Zen & Leon Fu Dot Com’s www.Cryptocurrency.Market channel because they were the 1st and only channel on the internet back in early 2013 that I found to be talking about trading and investing in bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. For example, they were the only channel that I know of to recommend investing in Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Stratis, Monero, Decred, NXT, Antshares, etc. when everyone else was afraid to do so. These coins all turned out to be huge winners.
I learned from the www.Cryptocurrency.Market channel that the #1 most important thing in cryptocurrencies is to survive. Unfortunately, many people who have bought cryptocurrencies lost them because of a lack of security, privacy and formal education on how to use their digital wallets correctly. The lack of blockchain tutorials amongst all cryptocurrencies is why I started my Blockchain Tutorial playlist on the Cryptocurrency Market channel. I believe uneducated newbies in the crypto community who do not understand what it takes to secure, protect and use their digital wallets will mistakenly leave their crypto on exchanges which is subject to being hacked or stolen and will not back up their private keys.
I have been monitoring the digital wallet space for quite some time now and I have chosen to associate my brand/ reputation & seek funding from the Decred community for due to the project’s a) professionalism b) software engineering/technical abilities and most importantly c) a working governance model and lastly d) the Decred team has a working decentralized wallet called Decrediton which is located on https://www.decred.org/downloads/.
For the above reasons and the fact that I am more comfortable working with people I have personally met in person, I RESPECTFULLY submit this formal proposal to the Decred community to request funding for myself to create an ambitious, 3rd party, independent, unbiased blockchain tutorials to educate the public on how to use the Decred wallet and Politeia account correctly.

III. Objectives

To create a series of tutorial videos to:
  1. Educate the public on how to setup and use the Decrediton wallet with a set of user friendly Blockchain Tutorials.
  2. Educate the public on how to set up a Politeia account and make a Politeia proposal.
  3. Educate the public on how to avoid common mistakes and pitfalls in key parts of the tutorials.

IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables

TUTORIAL 1: How To Set Up & Use The Decrediton Wallet ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will help viewers understand the initial process on how to download and install the Decrediton wallet.
  2. Explain how to receive and send Decred on the Decrediton wallet
  3. Explain how to backup, protect, and update the Decrediton wallet
TUTORIAL 2: How To Make A Politeia Account, Upvote/ Downvote and Comment ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will demonstrate how to make a Politeia account, show users how to upvote/ downvote and comment on the proposals.
TUTORIAL 3: How To Make A Politeia Proposal ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will provide the step by step details on how to make a Politeia Proposal.
TUTORIAL 4: How To Make A Stakepool Account And Stake ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will demonstrate how to make a stakepool account and stake Decred.

V. Pricing & Terms

If you are interested in having me create the video tutorials mentioned in Section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables for your crypto project the cost will be as follows:
  1. I respectfully request $1,000 worth of Decred for me to complete the section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables.
  2. The grand total cost of section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables = $1,000.
  3. The estimated completion time for this entire proposal: 8 Hours x 4 Videos = 31.25 Hours x $30 USD/hour = $1,000 USD for Content Creation. This proposed schedule is to do this work in under 1 month allowing me to create 1 tutorial per week.
  4. Payment will be paid to me in Decred (DCR) by a Decred Representative and will be processed after all 4 tutorials are accepted by the Decred community. I will email a Decred Representative an invoice with the details.
  5. I will include 1 revision per video.

VI. Conditions

  1. The tutorials will be hosted on the Decred YouTube channel or any other official platform and not hosted anywhere else.
  2. I will get all my basic questions answered on Decred support channels.
  3. I will state in the videos that I’m being sponsored by the Decred Community/ Politeia anywhere that is deemed appropriate.
  4. Decred will own the copyrights to the content created in this SOW and the Decred Project has the right to use the content without asking me for permission.
  5. Videos will follow the Decred design guidelines and model the higher production value of Decred videos.
  6. Videos will be reviewed for accuracy by representatives of the Decred community before being released to the public.
I am submitting this first draft of my proposed Statement Of Work (SOW) to invite feedback and commentary from the Decred community.

VII. Acceptance & Authorization

The representatives below have the authority to represent & agree to this Statement of Work between Decred Project and Denni Lovejoy.

_________________________________
Signature Date
Denni Lovejoy, Blockchain Tutorial Specialist
[[email protected]](mailto:[email protected])
www.Cryptocurrency.Market

_________________________________
Signature Date
Politeia For Decred Community
Decred Project
https://www.decred.org/


The following are questions are for Decred to consider and are not part of the SOW.
Statement Of Work (SOW) FAQ:
1. What is Denni Lovejoy’s big picture approach to help educate and promote Decred to the public?
This entire SOW is based on the premise that Decred is sponsoring me to do a series of educational/ tutorial style videos of the cryptocurrency governance coin sector.
2. Why are you taking a tutorial-based style approach to the videos?
The reason for this approach is to help viewers AVOID any mistakes they may make while going through ANY of the processes associated with using Decred software.
3. Will you follow the Decred design guidelines and have consistent screen-design intro/ outros?
Yes, I plan to use consistent screen-design and leverage anything additional the Decred design and support team can offer me including intro, outros, disclaimers, ideas, etc. I will be following the guidelines found on https://decred.org/brand/.
4. Do you plan to publish the videos on the Youtube channel of your company or will they go into the official Decred Youtube channel?
No, I do not plan to publish the videos on our 'Cryptocurrency Market' YouTube channel which has over 26,000 subscribers and over 700 videos. Decred will have all the rights to the videos and will not be hosted elsewhere.
5. What is your target reach expectations and how do you want to keep the videos up-to-date if something changes in the GUI/software?
I do not plan on doing any advertising or marketing for the tutorials and will let the Decred PR marketing team strategize that. I can consult with the PR team as needed, but my proposal is to create video content only suggested by the community.
I will give 1 revision per video if any of the videos need updating.
6. Did the other cryptocurrency projects you made video tutorials for also pay for their production?
No. My approach has been to create 66 blockchain tutorials for free first, to then leverage this work portfolio as my Proof-Of-Skill so that I can approach projects like Decred with my proposal.
7. After watching your videos on youtube the production does not feel in step with our current educational videos: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLaMrpvQ0yJ_xFLGwNoDzfT6Wr0XHpyr1R
I can adapt to the current style of educational videos listed in the EDU.DCR playlist. The main differences I can adjust to are: a) include background music b) use themed transitions and text pop ups, c) do audio voice over only and d) no face footage on the bottom right corner of the screen. If this is what the community prefers, let me know. However, I can add one element to the tutorials for consideration. I can record my face while guiding viewers through the tutorial to offer a more human feel as if I'm holding your hand or you're looking over my shoulders in every step of the process.

Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions about my proposal.

NOTES:

TUTORIAL 1: How To Set Up & Use The Decrediton Wallet ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will help viewers understand the initial process on how to download and install the Decrediton wallet.
  2. Explain how to receive and send Decred on the Decrediton wallet
  3. Explain how to backup, protect, and update the Decrediton wallet
TUTORIAL 2: How To Make A Politeia Account, Upvote/ Downvote and Comment ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will demonstrate how to make a Politeia account, show users how to upvote/ downvote and comment on the proposals.
TUTORIAL 3: How To Make A Politeia Proposal ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will provide the step by step details on how to make a Politeia Proposal.
TUTORIAL 4: How To Make A Stakepool Account And Stake ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will demonstrate how to make a stakepool account and stake Decred.
submitted by DenniLovejoy to decred [link] [comments]

The Secret is There is No Secret

 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 tl;dr VISIT THIS: °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ The Secret is there is NO Secret. - - ∵ ƸӜƷ ∴ 𝓐𝓻𝓽𝓲𝓼𝓽𝓲𝓬 𝓓𝓲𝓼𝓬𝓵𝓪𝓲𝓶𝓮𝓻: https://pastebin.com/Ux0Uk2em Once you see #ᵀᴴᴱᴳᴬᴹᴱ23 you cannot unsee it anymore. Once you play #ᵀᴴᴱᴳᴬᴹᴱ23 you cannot unplay it anymore. By reading this you affirm that you are +21 y.o. and that you consent to playing #ᵀᴴᴱᴳᴬᴹᴱ23 Otherwise, if you don't want to risk becoming psychotic, please STOP READING NAO. 🔥 𝖞𝖔𝖚 𝖍𝖆𝖛𝖊 𝖇𝖊𝖊𝖓 𝖜𝖆𝖗𝖓𝖊𝖉 🔥 BIG NEWS!!! This GAME will heal The World. Call The Others and PLAY IT! Read slowly: http://pastebin.com/YbmG6ETq #TheGame23 Source: https://twitter.com/alejodorowsky/status/522097534450552832 By https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alejandro_Jodorowsky MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMM ☯ Welcome to #ᵀᴴᴱᴳᴬᴹᴱ23 ☿ MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMM The Secret is there is NO Secret. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMh.`-+mMmsomMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMs .ho .dMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMs `dMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMs :MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMh` sMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMh. .NMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMN: `mMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMo .:/ohMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMy +NMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMs -mMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNNNNNMMMMMMMm/ .mMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNh/-.``````..:yds-` `+NMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMd/` `dMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMy- /mMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMh- `:/+odMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMs sMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMm` `dMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMo `mMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM/ +MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNM/ `dMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMh.-. +MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMs `+sdMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMm. .dMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMd: `.-+yd+` :yNMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmo-..` -dMMMMMNd/` `sMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMNdyo++/:---...``-yMMMMMMMMNdhhhddmMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMM ...or maybe YES. MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM tl;dr: #TheGame23 introduces #DangerousIdea23: ↪ #𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝟐𝟑 is a blockchained Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning self-organized System based on a mutating h-index type algorithm. ↪ #𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝟐𝟑, as an idea, has been validated —though in any way 'endorsed'— by Google's lead of Google.ai, Google’s AI division, computer scientist Jeff Dean and by Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum.. ↪ #𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝟐𝟑 will be used by a Team of Sages to assist them in ruling the World and to replace "democrazy" for a true 𝐓𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐌𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐳𝐲. [ PROOF of Jeff Dean and Vitalik Buterin's replies to #TheGame23 agent: https://i.imgur.com/CMEvTi0.jpg ] [ PROOF of Jeff Dean and Vitalik Buterin's replies to #TheGame23 agent: https://i.imgur.com/CMEvTi0.jpg ] [ PROOF of Jeff Dean and Vitalik Buterin's replies to #TheGame23 agent: https://i.imgur.com/CMEvTi0.jpg ] ...ticktockticktockticktock... 𝓘 𝓵𝓲𝓴𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓲𝓼 #𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝟐𝟑 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓪. 𝓗𝓸𝔀 𝓬𝓪𝓷 𝓘 𝓱𝓮𝓵𝓹? ↪ Tweet this: "Bye bye 'democrazy'. Hello TechnoMeritocrazy. Read carefully: https://pastebin.com/FbYPPbrc #TheGame23 #TechnoMeritocrazy #HIVEMIND23" ↪ Share this idea and this pastebin and spread the message with these hasghtags: #HIVEMIND23 and #TechnoMeritocrazy ↪ Create & share original Art, be that an image, a wallpaper, a YouTube video, an mp3... featuring #TheGame23 and the #𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝟐𝟑 idea. ↪ Speak about it on boards and social networks. Send a kind email/tweet/DM to experts you know, introducing the idea. ↪ Start an Etherpad/GitHub/Board/whatever and begin to politely brainstorm and discuss design and code ideas with fellow hackers. ↪ Monitor https://twitter.com/search?q=%23TheGame23 and you will be updated with news as they happen. ↪ Join https://TheGame23.com and you will be updated with news as they happen. ƸӜƷ SHALL WE PLAY A GAME? ƸӜƷ ↪ START HERE FIRST; Oct 14, 2014; 30.000 views: https://pastebin.com/YbmG6ETq ↪ #TheGame23 META-Instructions by twitter.com/m1vr4 https://pastebin.com/wDN9DpdC ↪ #TheGame23 Artistic Disclaimer: https://pastebin.com/Ux0Uk2em ^^ .-=-=-=-. ^^ ^^ (`-=-=-=-=-`) ^^ (`-=-=-=-=-=-=-`) ^^ ^^ ^^ (`-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-`) ^^ ^^ ( `-=-=-=-(@)-=-=-` ) ^^ (`-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-`) ^^ (`-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-`) ^^ (`-= #𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝟐𝟑--`) ^^ (`-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-`) ^^ (`-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-`) ^^ (`-=-=-=-=-=-=-`) ^^ ^^ (`-=-=-=-=-`) `-=-=-=-=-` "Only those who attempt the absurd can achieve the impossible." Albert Einstein https://i.imgur.com/ldPEVU9.jpg ↪ ʜᴏᴡ ᴛᴏ ʜᴀᴄᴋ ᴛʜᴇ ᴘʟᴀɴᴇᴛ ɪɴ 𝟷 ʟɪɴᴇ ᴏғ ᴄᴏᴅᴇ: ᴛʜᴇ ☢ 𝐓𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐌𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐳𝐲 ☸ `-.`'.-' `-. ∵ƸӜƷ∴ .-'. `-. -./\.- .-' -. /_|\ .- `-. `/____\' .-'. `-. -./.-""-.\.- ' `-. /< (()) >\ .-' - .`/__`-..-'__\' .- ,...`-./___|____|___\.-'.,. ,-' ,` . . ', `-, ,-' ________________ `-, ,'/____|_____|_____\ / /__|_____|_____|___\ / /|_____|_____|_____|_\ ' /____|_____|_____|_____\ .' /__|_____|_____|_____|___\ ,' /|_____|_____|_____|_____|_\ ,,---''--...___...--'''--.. /../____|_____|_____|_____|_____\ ..--```--...___...--``---,, '../__|_____|_____|_____|_____|___\ \ ) '.:/|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_\ ( / )\ / ) ,':./____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____\ ( \ /( / / ( ( /:../__|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|___\ ) ) \ \ | | \ \ /.../|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_\ / / | | .-.\ \ \ \ '..:/____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____|_____\ / / / /.-. (= )\ `._.' | \:./ _ _ ___ ____ ____ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___\ | `._.' /( =) \ (_) ) \./ |\/| |__) |___ |___ |___ _X_ _X_ \/ _|_ \ ( (_) / \ `----' """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""" `----' / \ ____\__ #HIVEMIND23 ᴛᴇᴄʜɴᴏᴍᴇʀɪᴛᴏᴄʀᴀᴢʏ __/____ / \ (=\ \ / /-) / \_)_\ \ 𝐁𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐝 𝐀𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐚𝐥 𝐈𝐧𝐭𝐞𝐥𝐥𝐢𝐠𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐞 𝐚𝐧𝐝 / /_(_/ \ \ 𝐃𝐞𝐞𝐩 𝐋𝐞𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐬𝐞𝐥𝐟-𝐨𝐫𝐠𝐚𝐧𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐝 𝐒𝐲𝐬𝐭𝐞𝐦 𝐛𝐚𝐬𝐞𝐝 𝐨𝐧 𝐚 / / ) _ ) 𝐦𝐮𝐭𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐡-𝐢𝐧𝐝𝐞𝐱 𝐭𝐲𝐩𝐞 𝐚𝐥𝐠𝐨𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐦 ( _ ( ( (,-' `-..__ __..-' `-,) ) \_.-'' ``-..____ ____..-'' ``-._/ `-._ ``--...____...--'' _.-' `-.._ ∵ ƸӜƷ ∴ _..-' `-..__ #𝐓𝐡𝐞𝐆𝐚𝐦𝐞𝟐𝟑 __..-' ``-..____ εν το παν ____..-'' ``--...____...--'' 𝘿 𝙚 𝙢 𝙤 𝙘 𝙧 𝙖 𝙯 𝙮 𝙞 𝙨 𝙗 𝙧 𝙤 𝙠 𝙚 𝙣 ☠ Let’s fix it. And it’s been broken since the very beginning: Socrates (470 – 399 BC) was killed ‘democratically’. [ See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trial_of_Socrates#Support_for_Oligarchic_Rule_and_Contempt_for_Athenian_Democracy ] Socrates openly espoused certain ‘anti-democratic’ views, most prominent perhaps being the view that it is not majority opinion that yields correct policy but rather genuine knowledge and professional competence, which is possessed by only a few: Socrates set the basis for the future TechnoMeritocracy. Democracy has been broken very especially since the Military-Industrial Complex —as Eisenhower warned us in his famous speech in 1961— and a bunch of psychopaths and ignorants have taken our lives and the lives of our beloved ones as well as the lives of several billion people buried in life. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military-industrial_complex https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gg-jvHynP9Y - Jan, 17 - 1961 Eisenhower's "Military-Industrial Complex" Speech Origins and Significance This is our State-of-the-Art Pyramid as human species: ***> “The world’s 62 richest people now own as much wealth as the 3.6 billion people who make up the poorest half of the global population.” Source: https://www.oxfam.org/sites/www.oxfam.org/files/file_attachments/bp210-economy-one-percent-tax-havens-180116-en_0.pdf ***> “Almost 1 billion people are undernourished or lack vitamins and minerals.” Source: http://www.fao.org/state-of-food-security-nutrition/en/ Is that really the absolute very best that we can do after more than 300.000 years of evolution as Homo Sapiens and 3 million years since the first Homo Habilis? Do you still think that ‘Democrazy’ is the absolute very best way to rule the world? If not, please keep on reading. ↪ ᴡᴇʟᴄᴏᴍᴇ ᴛᴏ ᴛʜᴇ ᴛᴇᴄʜɴᴏᴍᴇʀɪᴛᴏᴄʀᴀᴢʏ These are the 2 central tenets of the ᴛᴇᴄʜɴᴏᴍᴇʀɪᴛᴏᴄʀᴀᴢʏ: ↪ 1. We are NOT all equal: the vote of a psychopath or an ignorant can’t be equal to that of a decent citizen. ↪ 2. Only the ‘scientifically proven’ best and most skillful, the most honest, generous and willing to serve people in the world should rule us. ↪ This is HOW to Hack the Planet in 1 line of ‘Code’: With a blockchained Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning self-organized System based on a ‘mutating’ h-index type algorithm. If you don’t agree with that, please stop reading now. Thank you for your time. If you do agree with that and feel curious to know more, please keep on reading. Thanks. 𝓘 𝓯𝓮𝓮𝓵 𝓬𝓾𝓻𝓲𝓸𝓾𝓼 𝓪𝓷𝓭 𝔀𝓪𝓷𝓽 𝓽𝓸 𝓴𝓷𝓸𝔀 𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓮 In The Internet Galaxy (2001), Manuel Castells (the 2000–2014 research survey of the Social Sciences Citation Index ranks him as the world’s fifth most-cited social science scholar, and the foremost-cited communication scholar in the world) talks about the ‘network society’ culture being techno-meritocratic, for hackers and virtual communitarians, and entrepreneurial. You have to be crazy to question democrazy. Very, very crazy. For you are going to have to fight against 2.500 years of mental and political conditioning and not everybody is ready to dare to get rid of the beliefs and prejudices that the family, the school, the college, the laws, the culture… have unconsciously programmed us with. “It is harder to crack a prejudice than an atom.” Albert Einstein And you are going to have to fight not only with yourself but against the others. For almost nobody is ready to be unplugged from this subtle Prison for our Minds. “The Matrix is a system, Neo. That system is our enemy. But when you’re inside, you look around, what do you see? Businessmen, teachers, lawyers, carpenters. The very minds of the people we are trying to save. But until we do, these people are still a part of that system and that makes them our enemy. You have to understand, most of these people are not ready to be unplugged. And many of them are so inured, so hopelessly dependent on the system, that they will fight to protect it.” Morpheus – The Matrix When you face others in denial regarding this idea you have to remember 2 things: Patience. Perserverance. ↪ #TheGame23 ‘𝓓𝓪𝓷𝓰𝓮𝓻𝓸𝓾𝓼’ 𝓘𝓭𝓮𝓪 𝓝𝓾𝓶𝓫𝓮𝓻 23: Let’s build #𝐇𝐈𝐕𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐍𝐃𝟐𝟑, a 𝐖𝐨𝐫𝐥𝐝 𝐖𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐓𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐌𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐳𝐲. The most apt, the most sage, intelligent, the best prepared, technically or artistically minded, in any of the branches of Human Knowledge —in the Trivium et Quadrivim spirit— and also the most kind, generous and willing to serve the others, as tagged to be the best ones by others like them, will jump straight to the top of a TechnoMeritocratic Pyramid to manage and administrate world material and human resources world wide. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figurative_system_of_human_knowledge https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trivium https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrivium How? Hacking the Planet with 1 line of ‘Code’: With a blockchained Artificial Intelligence and Deep Learning self-organized System based on a ‘mutating’ h-index type algorithm. See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blockchain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_learning https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Self-organization https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/H-index https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Algorithm 𝐈𝐦𝐚𝐠𝐢𝐧𝐞 This is ONLY a draft for the implementation of the idea: the idea has to be implemented by a Community of Hackers and Experts and not by a single individual. Now… Imagine a Pyramid of Excellence and Nobility with 10? (just to say a number) Supersages, Conscious Scientifics and Artists, all powerful, each one of these an expert in one branch of Human Knowledge, in the Liberal Arts education, in the Trivium et Quadrivium style, whom were tagged and chosen to be the Supersages by the human community, according to an h-index type algorithm. The h-index is an author-level metric that attempts to measure both the productivity and citation impact of the publications of a scientist or scholar. This could be used to implement a kind of “PageRank” for people, where the people most knowledgeable about a subject would ascend steps in the Pyramid and whose tags/votes would carry more weight in the algorithm to be computed by an Artificial Intelligence system than those on the base of the Pyramid. Imagine that those Supersages could be rotating each certain time (in order to avoid corruption or abuses of power), as determined by the Council of Computer Scientists in charge for the development of the algorithm. Imagine that the algorithm was used so that those 10 Supersages or Experts could designate other sub-experts, whom would designate other sub-experts one step below in the Pyramid to assist them, whom could designate further sub-experts down the Pyramid and so on and so forth… in order to work with concrete and urgent issues such as the search for the cure of cancer or any Global Catastrophic Risks such as the imminent threat of Climate Change. Maybe the fact that trusting 10 Supersages on top of the Pyramid to manage the planet thanks to an Artificial Intelligence permanently mutating in its algorithm might sound a bit distopic, right? Well, that’s an easy one: let’s try and see what happens: that’s the hacker attitude, right? See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_arts_education https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Author-level_metric https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Citation_impact https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PageRank https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_catastrophic_risk How to test the validity of this ‘𝐃𝐚𝐧𝐠𝐞𝐫𝐨𝐮𝐬’ 𝐈𝐝𝐞𝐚 #23? First an anonymous #TheGame23 agent wondered who might be the best person in the world to understand this idea. S/he needed only the absolute very best: in the same spirit that we would do if we had the System already built. This is Jeff Dean: https://www.csail.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2018-10/Jeff-Dean-FINAL.jpg Jeff Dean, computer scientist and software engineer. He is currently the lead of Google.ai, Google’s AI division. If you want to know more about Jeff Dean’s work at Google, this is his home page: https://ai.google/research/people/jeff If you are not deeply impressed enough yet, you can read "The Jeff Dean Facts". [ http://www.informatika.bg/jeffdean ] Due to his impressive background and expertise, and as lead of Google’s Artificial Intelligence division, Jeff seemed to be exceptionally well positioned to understand the idea. 𝟏𝟎 𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬 𝐨𝐟 ‘𝐂𝐨𝐝𝐞’ 𝐭𝐨 𝐇𝐚𝐜𝐤 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐭 Several years ago, on Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 11:43 AM an anonymous #TheGame23 player sent these 10 lines of ‘Code’ to Jeff Dean: Hi Mr. Dean, Have you considered building a “PageRank” for people? Imagine the following scenario: a meteorite is detected and it is predicted that it will hit the Earth in 24 months. Suddenly, a worldwide challenge arises: to arrange a team in the shortest amount of time with the best engineers in the whole world coordinating world resources in order to work together towards deviating/desintegrating such threat to human survival. Idea: a kind of a “h-index” would solve this in the shortest amount of time. A Reputation Engine that would rank items (where items = human beings or products) according to a certain parameter, be it “trust”, “skillfulness at mathematics”, “knowledge about meteorites”, “leadership”, “honesty”…, etc. In our view, this could hugely improve the world for the better, not only to deviate meteorites but to manage anything from running a company to running nationwide governments. Question: do you see this as impossible to code? If you want more info, please let me know. Regards, [#TheGame23 player] Jeff Dean kindly replied to that message on Nov 10, 2015, 5:14 AM: Hi [#TheGame23 player], I’ve thought about similar things a few times. I do think there are lots of benefits in getting people with similar interests that don’t otherwise know each other or interact to do so. Unfortunately, I haven’t had a lot of time to work on this. I think that one would really want it to not be a single PageRank value per person, but rather a context-sensitive value, depending on what kinds of expertise was of interest. Someone that knows a lot about the structure of concrete should be very high in the context of answering materials sciences kinds of questions, but probably low in the context of answering psychology questions. A good place to start might be to use large corpora of published scientific articles as the way of computing this information. Unfortunately, I’m busy enough with other things that these ideas remain mostly just occasional thoughts rather than an active project. –Jeff Excellent. Jeff Dean not only understood #TheGame23 player's idea but he actually shared some ideas about how to improve it. Unfortunately —and understandbly— he is quite busy to develop it. Thank you Jeff. Then that #TheGame23 player thought that it was needed to contact the absolute very best person in the world to understand blockchain and cryptocurrencies. That person was that genius called Vitalik Buterin, obviously. Co-founder of Ethereum, THE blockchain platform. Vitalik Buterin: https://i.imgur.com/W9CRCx5.png Vitalik Buterin (Russian: Виталий Дмитриевич Бутерин; born January 31, 1994) is a Russian–Canadian programmer and writer primarily known as a co-founder of Ethereum and as a co-founder of Bitcoin Magazine. On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 5:45 AM that #TheGame23 player sent to Vitalik the same email that s/he sent to Jeff Dean. He got back on Tue, May 3, 2016, 12:48 AM with the following reply: Hmm, sounds like what you’re describing essentially is what we call a “decentralized reputation system”. So yes, quite doable on ethereum, and there may be groups trying to do it already. Great. Vitalik also understood the idea and even assured #TheGame23 player that it could be done on Ethereum. Thank you Vitalik. [ PROOF of Jeff Dean and Vitalik Buterin's replies to #TheGame23 agent: https://i.imgur.com/CMEvTi0.jpg ] [ PROOF of Jeff Dean and Vitalik Buterin's replies to #TheGame23 agent: https://i.imgur.com/CMEvTi0.jpg ] [ PROOF of Jeff Dean and Vitalik Buterin's replies to #TheGame23 agent: https://i.imgur.com/CMEvTi0.jpg ] #TheGame23 player got the two confirmations that s/he needed: now the System was ready to run on its own. Something like this would definitely change the world for the better. From the technological to the economics, to the political, the ethical and even the philosophical: now we know that it IS doable. 𝓘 𝓵𝓲𝓴𝓮 𝓽𝓱𝓲𝓼 #HIVEMIND23 𝓲𝓭𝓮𝓪. 𝓗𝓸𝔀 𝓬𝓪𝓷 𝓘 𝓱𝓮𝓵𝓹? ↪ Share this idea and this pastebin and spread the message with these hasghtags: #HIVEMIND23 and #TechnoMeritocrazy ↪ Create some original Art, be that an image, a wallpaper, a YouTube video, an mp3... featuring #TheGame23 and the #HIVEMIND23 idea. ↪ Speak about it in boards and social networks. Send a kind email/tweet/DM to experts you know, introducing the idea. ↪ Start an Etherpad/GitHub/Board/whatever and begin to politely brainstorm and discuss design and code ideas with fellow hackers. ↪ Monitor https://twitter.com/search?q=%23TheGame23 and you will be updated with news as they happen. ↪ Join https://TheGame23.com and you will be updated with news as they happen. FAQ: Q: Is #HIVEMIND23 the perfect system of government? A: No. None is. But we firmly believe that, as Socrates sharply suggested —and even died for it—, this is the least bad. Q: Is this a technocrazy? A: No, this is a 𝐓𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐌𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐳𝐲. Q: Is this a meritocrazy? A: No, this is a 𝐓𝐞𝐜𝐡𝐧𝐨𝐌𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐭𝐨𝐜𝐫𝐚𝐳𝐲. Q: Is this a Black Mirror episode like Nosedive? A: No. Q: Is this going to work like the Social Credit System in China? A: No. Not. At. All. Actually this is the polar opposite to that. Q: Why you don’t have the Answers to all the Questions? A: Because we are only humans. Instead, we want all of us to politely dialogue, brainstorm and answer as many questions that we all pose about Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats of this ‘Dangerous’ Idea together. License: Public Domain The anonymous #TheGame23 player who originally sent those several hundred mysterious emails from 2014 to 2016 has released this idea into the Public Domain in order to guarantee that we (the writers of this pastebin/webpage/etc.) don’t pursue any material benefit with it at all. Once it’s been released, the idea doesn’t belong to us anymore: it’s absolutely free for you to act upon it. Or not. 𝐅𝐢𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐠𝐡𝐭𝐬 We as the global Human kind that we are, face global challenges of an imminent urgency, such as as Climate Change and a million other problems. With millions of children dying of hunger each year, this cannot bet the best of all possible worlds as Leibniz suggested. We must have done something terribly wrong. …are we really thinking that thanks to “““Democrazy””” in all its splendor, we prefer, as it’s been already “““proved””” to be the best type of systems of government, after more than 300.000 years of Evolution, to have in the apex of the Pyramid in order to set the destiny of the world to… …this?: https://media.giphy.com/media/cNNcBeouzDHLBMEGRH/giphy.gif Thank You. Imagine. "You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete." - Buckminster Fuller - https://i.imgur.com/thET9a5.jpg This is for the Crazy ones: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8rwsuXHA7RA / \ / \ { } { } { { } } \ \ / / \ Y / .-"`"`"-. ,` 11:11 \ / #ᵀᴴᴱᴳᴬᴹᴱ23 \ / Sir Eliah! \ { ;"";, } { /";`'`,; } \{ ;`,'`;. / { }`""` } /} { } { // {||} { / `"' `"' - tl;dr VISIT THIS: °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ °º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com ,ø¤°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ ℒℴνℯ, @m1Vr4 #TheGame23 Or maybe yes... - ∵ ƸӜƷ ∴ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEHPNFPfMfQ/3nrMIAhVQJMaDeV5UFAlwzwmMACgkQhVQJMaDe V5V4GQ//X9fY8ReMfdfUcaJf/CUN7wjUWzm6WabtvdpBdAJ22FZszwn0fJuybsEb iqoUHVrpFg/3vgu8DN6GM+GWAKCmL7kY+/IaAVkevjjIm8sB4jJdp/8YF89r6OBs fYSWySMin0y2ESLORZYhqAi02yvJV3e1vc9TvlvgIA27L7zV7sCYmwRyG67DdHO8 DF3nhL6vP0AlRu2uMjnsZI7wFPD+EQiQ9N3QBlAB2bdXH2Miw6L6S+O7oKmDH/kq X7B78xYrdA84MICAnFISx6Lo0m/cGruF0+hCn63N2UrVu9Bkq0noXLoPDNEjEzVr e+NPu0tYE7SW1UXZtkUY+guaYzg0aiPKNxnekiC2jV+yBdWoSWWGtN6UAErsDPC5 67FytEsrCBGhgkarDgWXl0MLYX69Ieg9tiqlupFZ8hsZCTQ/JVt52gJRvLvs2fdh 9ujMGbsknWZFiPqU4Onp11e8jorz527sQ5fZ9VzVksOz+DGqt8SJNX0ajHRxgIfR IY8qnMDXUXnUqJmReV/QWDwhoK4byROF5gEB/IsDlkGa0B2ru1izeFx11/HiKlVe 3xQqRYvl7Xg+AoqrbTtC3B4gdrVUeyCrtbY9RJFj3sf0IZ0d3cRFi0ypyRXd1p5r 3Jey+8x4/ccZ5ULGjXF/caFrM5DgnP+eQtoT8BgRrK/Zw6NAJwE= =ybXv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
https://pastebin.com/FbYPPbrc

http://technomeritocrazy.wordpress.com
submitted by ScienTolog2 to publishcopypasta [link] [comments]

Proposed Statement Of Work (SOW) For Horizen Blockchain Wallet Tutorial Campaign

Date: February 13, 2019
Client’s Name: Horizen
Project Name: Horizen Blockchain Wallet Tutorial Campaign
Representatives For Each Cryptocurrency Project: Horizen Community
Representatives For www.Cryptocurrency.Market:
Denni Lovejoy, Software Tutorial Specialist, https://twitter.com/DenniLovejoy

I. Summary

Currently there are over 2,000 cryptocurrency projects listed on coinmarketcap.com. Many of these cryptocurrency projects have their own official “decentralized wallets”, use recommended third-party wallets or are in the process of developing their wallet software.
For example, the Horizen community created the Horizen Wallet & Sphere Wallet (beta).
Many newcomers entering the crypto market are not computer or software savvy and will not properly set up, protect and secure their cryptocurrency wallets. Crypto projects such as Horizen will need user-friendly Blockchain Tutorials for the Horizen Wallet to help new users understand how to use the wallet correctly.
The goal of this proposal is to obtain funding to create:
  1. Create a complete set of basic Horizen wallet tutorials to help educate the public on how to use the the Horizen wallet in a step by step user friendly way. This set of tutorials will include:
  1. Create an online advertisement campaign to effectively distribute the videos, gain brand awareness and grow the Horizen community. This advertising campaign will include, but is not limited to, Google PPC (Pay Per Click) advertising. (Optional)

II. Introduction

My name is Denni Lovejoy, I am a Blockchain Tutorial Specialist at www.Cryptocurrency.Market and you can view the quality of my past blockchain tutorials here:
Blockchain Tutorial Playlist
Blockchain Tutorial #35 - How To Setup A Horizen Wallet
I started creating blockchain tutorials to help newbies avoid getting hacked by bad actors in the crypto community. I chose to work with Tai Zen & Leon Fu Dot Com’s www.Cryptocurrency.Market channel because they were the 1st and only channel on the internet back in early 2013 that I found to be talking about trading and investing in bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. For example, they were the only channel that I know of to recommend investing in Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Stratis, Monero, Decred, NXT, Antshares, etc. when everyone else was afraid to do so. These coins all turned out to be huge winners.
I learned from the www.Cryptocurrency.Market channel that the #1 most important thing in cryptocurrencies is to survive. Unfortunately, many people who have bought cryptocurrencies lost them because of a lack of security, privacy and formal education on how to use their digital wallets correctly. The lack of blockchain tutorials amongst all cryptocurrencies is why I started my Blockchain Tutorial playlist on the Cryptocurrency Market channel. I believe uneducated newbies in the crypto community who do not understand what it takes to secure, protect and use their digital wallets will mistakenly leave their crypto on exchanges which is subject to being hacked or stolen and will not back up their private keys.
I have been monitoring the digital wallet space for quite some time now and I have chosen to associate my brand/ reputation & seek funding from the Horizen community for due to the project’s a) professionalism b) software engineering/technical abilities and most importantly c) a working privacy cryptocurrency and lastly d) the Horizen team has working decentralized wallets located on https://www.horizen.global/wallets/.
For the above reasons and the fact that I am more comfortable working with people I have personally met in person, I RESPECTFULLY submit this formal proposal to the Horizen community to request funding for myself to create an ambitious, 3rd party, independent, unbiased blockchain tutorials and online advertising campaign to educate the public on how to use the Horizen wallet correctly.

III. Objectives

To create a series of tutorial videos to:
  1. EDUCATE the public on how to setup and use the Horizen wallet with a set of user friendly Blockchain Tutorials.
  2. ATTRACT new users with Google Adwords such as Google PPC advertising.
  3. Educate the public on how to avoid common mistakes and pitfalls in key parts of the tutorials.

IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables


PHASE I: Explain How To Install And Download The Horizen Wallet ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. This phase focuses on facts & helps viewers understand the initial process on how to download and install the Horizen wallet.
  2. Explain how to find the correct domain name/ website.
  3. Identify the correct wallet to choose and why.
  4. Demonstrate how to DOWNLOAD the wallet.
  5. Demonstrate how to INSTALL the wallet.
  6. Demonstrate how to verify that you can open and close the wallet.
  7. Showcase the user-interface and it’s features including how to create an account.
Blockchain Tutorial #35 - How To Setup A Horizen Wallet (Complete)

PHASE II: Explain How To Receive Horizen On The Horizen Wallet ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. This phase focuses on how to properly receive Horizen using the Horizen wallet.
  2. Demonstrate how to copy and paste the address from inside the wallet.
  3. Demonstrate how to send the public address to the account/ person sending you Horizen.
  4. Demonstrate how to verify the transaction on the block explorer.
  5. Explain how to RECEIVE Horizen starting with a small test transaction.
  6. Explain how to receive the rest of the Horizen to your Horizen wallet after the test transaction.

PHASE III: Explain How To Send Horizen On The Horizen Wallet ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will provide a demonstration on how to send Horizen using the Horizen wallet.
  2. Demonstrate how to EXCHANGE Bitcoin for Horizen.
  3. Demonstrate how to send a test transaction to the Horizen wallet.
  4. Demonstrate how to verify the test transaction on the block explorer.
  5. Explain how to confirm that the transaction is received.
  6. Demonstrate how to send the rest of the Horizen to the Horizen wallet after the test transaction.
  7. Finally, demonstrate how to SEND Horizen from your Horizen wallet to another Horizen account starting with a small test transaction and then the full amount.

PHASE IV: Explain How To Backup And Protect Horizen On The Horizen Wallet ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. This phase focuses on how to properly backup and protect Horizen using the Horizen wallet & the importance of doing so in order to retrieve funds from a computer or device that gets lost, stolen, or compromised.
  2. Demonstrate how to open the Horizen wallet to start backup process.
  3. Explain how to look for the ‘Backup’ or ‘Export Private Keys’ option.
  4. Demonstrate how to start the BACKUP process.
  5. Explain how to verify that the backup is complete.
  6. Explain how to save the backup file on a flashdrive.
  7. Explain how to print a paper wallet and safely secure it.

PHASE V: Explain How To Update The Horizen Wallet ($250) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will provide updates on the Horizen wallet & show viewers how to update the Horizen wallet to the latest version along with how to update the passwords and settings associated with the account.
  2. Explain why viewers must back up their wallet first before updating wallet.
  3. Demonstrate how to UPDATE the Horizen wallet.
  4. Explain how to update their personal computer or mobile device if needed.
  5. Demonstrate how to protect the Horizen wallet by updating passwords or passphrases.
  6. Explain how to add additional security layers such as Two-Factor Authorization (2FA).

V - “Online Advertising” Deliverables (Optional)

1. Google Adwords ($250):
Bidding Strategy: Pay-Per-Click (PPC) advertising
Timeframe: 2 weeks to 1 month
Keywords: Bitcoin, Cryptocurrency, Blockchain, and etc. related to Horizen
Target Demographics: Crypto-Enthusiasts, Cryptocurrency Miners, Investors, Traders, and etc. related to Horizen
Allocation: The entire ad budget can go to one video such as the “How To Download The Horizen Wallet Tutorial” or be split between 5 videos equaling a budget of $50 per video. 90% of funds will be used on Google Ads and 10% will be paid to myself to run and manage the ads.

VI. Pricing & Terms

If you are interested in having me complete the video tutorials mentioned in Section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables for Horizen and own the rights to the videos the cost will be as follows:
  1. I respectfully request $1,250 worth of Horizen (ZEN) for me to complete the section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables.
  2. I respectfully request $250 worth of ZEN for me to run ads towards the videos to complete the section V - “Online Advertising” Deliverables (Optional).
  3. The grand total cost of the Horizen Blockchain Wallet Tutorials & Advertising Campaign = $1,500 USD.
  4. The estimated completion time for this entire proposal is 1-2 months.
  5. Payment will be paid in ZEN by a Horizen Representative to me and will be processed after all 5 tutorials are accepted by the Horizen community. I will email a Horizen Representative an invoice with the details.

VII. Conditions

  1. The tutorials will be hosted on the Horizen YouTube channel or any other official platform and not hosted anywhere else.
  2. I will get all my basic questions answered on Horizen support channels.
  3. I will state in the videos that I’m being sponsored by the Horizen Community anywhere that is deemed appropriate.
  4. Horizen will own the copyrights to the content created in this SOW and the Horizen Project has the right to use the content without asking me for permission.
  5. Videos will follow the Horizen design guidelines.
  6. Videos will be reviewed for accuracy by representatives of the Horizen community before being released to the public.
I am submitting this first draft of my proposed Statement Of Work (SOW) to invite feedback and commentary from the Horizen community.

Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions about my proposal.
submitted by DenniLovejoy to Horizen [link] [comments]

Proposed Statement Of Work (SOW) For Dash Blockchain Wallet Tutorial Campaign

Date: February 12, 2019
Client’s Name: Dash
Project Name: Dash Blockchain Wallet Tutorial Campaign
Representative For Each Cryptocurrency Project: Dash Community
Representative For www.Cryptocurrency.Market:
Denni Lovejoy, Software Tutorial Specialist, https://twitter.com/DenniLovejoy

I. Summary

Currently there are over 2,000 cryptocurrency projects listed on coinmarketcap.com. Many of these cryptocurrency projects have their own official “decentralized wallets”, use recommended third-party wallets or are in the process of developing their wallet software.
For example, the Dash project created the Dash Core Wallet.
Many newcomers entering the crypto market are not computer or software savvy and will not properly set up, protect and secure their cryptocurrency wallets. Crypto projects such as Dash will need user-friendly Blockchain Tutorials for the Dash Core Wallet to help new users understand how to use the wallet correctly.
The goal of this proposal is to obtain funding to create:
  1. Create a set of Dash tutorials to help educate the public on how to use the the Dash Core wallet and Dash Central account in a step by step user friendly way. This set of tutorials will include:

II. Introduction

My name is Denni Lovejoy, I am a Blockchain Tutorial Specialist at www.Cryptocurrency.Market and you can view the quality of my past blockchain tutorials here:
Blockchain Tutorial Playlist
Blockchain Tutorial #4 - How To Setup A Dash Wallet - By Denni Lovejoy
I started creating blockchain tutorials to help newbies avoid getting hacked by bad actors in the crypto community. I chose to work with Tai Zen & Leon Fu Dot Com’s www.Cryptocurrency.Market channel because they were the 1st and only channel on the internet back in early 2013 that I found to be talking about trading and investing in bitcoin and cryptocurrencies. For example, they were the only channel that I know of to recommend investing in Bitcoin, Bitcoin Cash, Ethereum, Ethereum Classic, Stratis, Monero, Decred, NXT, Antshares, etc. when everyone else was afraid to do so. These coins all turned out to be huge winners.
I learned from the www.Cryptocurrency.Market channel that the #1 most important thing in cryptocurrencies is to survive. Unfortunately, many people who have bought cryptocurrencies lost them because of a lack of security, privacy and formal education on how to use their digital wallets correctly. The lack of blockchain tutorials amongst all cryptocurrencies is why I started my Blockchain Tutorial playlist on the Cryptocurrency Market channel. I believe uneducated newbies in the crypto community who do not understand what it takes to secure, protect and use their digital wallets will mistakenly leave their crypto on exchanges which is subject to being hacked or stolen and will not back up their private keys.
I have been monitoring the digital wallet space for quite some time now and I have chosen to associate my brand/ reputation & seek funding from the Dash community for due to the project’s a) professionalism b) software engineering/technical abilities and most importantly c) a working governance model and lastly d) the Dash team has a working decentralized wallet called Dash Core which is located on https://www.dash.org/get-dash/.
For the above reasons and the fact that I am more comfortable working with people I have personally met in person, I RESPECTFULLY submit this formal proposal to the Dash community to request funding for myself to create an ambitious, 3rd party, independent, unbiased blockchain tutorials to educate the public on how to use the Dash Core wallet and Dash Central account correctly.

III. Objectives

To create a series of tutorial videos to:
  1. Educate the public on how to setup and use the Dash wallet with a set of user friendly Blockchain Tutorials.
  2. Educate the public on how to set up a Dash Central account and make a Dash proposal.
  3. Educate the public on how to avoid common mistakes and pitfalls in key parts of the tutorials.

IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables

TUTORIAL 1: How To Set Up & Use The Dash Core Wallet ($500) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will help viewers understand the initial process on how to download and install the Dash Core wallet.
  2. Explain how to send and receive Dash on the Dash Core wallet.
  3. Explain how to backup, protect and update the Dash wallet.
TUTORIAL 2: How To Integrate Dash As A Payment Method And Get Your Business Listed On Dash Discover ($500) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will demonstrate how to integrate Dash as a payment method for business owners and get their business listed on Dash Discover.
TUTORIAL 3: How To Make A Dash Central Account, Upvote/ Downvote, Comment & Make A Dash Proposal ($500) [VIDEO FORMAT]
  1. In this phase, I will demonstrate how to make a Dash Central account, show users how to upvote/ downvote and comment on the proposals.
  2. In this phase, I also will provide the step by step details on how to make a Dash Proposal.

V. Pricing & Terms

If you are interested in having me create the video tutorials mentioned in Section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables for your crypto project the cost will be as follows:
  1. I respectfully request $1,500 worth of Dash for me to complete the section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables.
  2. The grand total cost of section IV. “Blockchain Tutorial” Deliverables = $1,920. (Includes 5 Dash Proposal Submission Fee)
  3. The estimated completion time for this entire proposal: 10 Hours x 4 Videos = 40 Hours x $37.5 USD/hour = $1,500 USD for Content Creation. This proposed schedule is to do this work in under 1 month allowing me to create 1 tutorial per week.
  4. Payment will be paid in Dash (DASH) by a Dash Representative to me and will be processed after all 3 tutorials are accepted by the Dash community. I will email a Dash Representative an invoice with the details.
  5. I will include 1 revision per video.

VI. Conditions

  1. The tutorials will be hosted on the Dash YouTube channel or any other official platform and not hosted anywhere else.
  2. I will get all my basic questions answered on Dash support channels.
  3. I will state in the videos that I’m being sponsored by the Dash Community anywhere that is deemed appropriate.
  4. Dash will own the copyrights to the content created in this SOW and the Dash Project has the right to use the content without asking me for permission.
  5. Videos will follow the Dash design guidelines.
  6. Videos will be reviewed for accuracy by representatives of the Dash community before being released to the public.
I am submitting this first draft of my proposed Statement Of Work (SOW) to invite feedback and commentary from the Dash community.


The following are questions are for PIVX to consider and are not part of the SOW.
Statement Of Work (SOW) FAQ:
1. What is Denni Lovejoy’s big picture approach to help educate and promote Dash to the public?
This entire SOW is based on the premise that Dash is sponsoring me to do a series of educational/ tutorial style videos of the cryptocurrency governance coin sector.
2. Why are you taking a tutorial-based style approach to the videos?
The reason for this approach is to help viewers AVOID any mistakes they may make while going through ANY of the processes associated with using Dash software.
3. Will you follow the Dash design guidelines and have consistent screen-design intro/ outros?
Yes, I plan to use consistent screen-design and leverage anything additional the Dash design and support team can offer me including intro, outros, disclaimers, ideas, etc. I will be following the guidelines found on https://www.dash.org/graphics/.
4. Do you plan to publish the videos on the Youtube channel of your company or will they go into the official Dash Youtube channel?
No, I do not plan to publish the videos on our 'Cryptocurrency Market' YouTube channel which has over 26,000 subscribers and over 700 videos. Dash will have all the rights to the videos and will not be hosted elsewhere.
5. What is your target reach expectations and how do you want to keep the videos up-to-date if something changes in the GUI/software?
I do not plan on doing any advertising or marketing for the tutorials and will let the Dash PR marketing team strategize that. I can speak with the PR team as needed, but my proposal is to create video content only suggested by the community.
I will give 1 revision per video if any of the videos need updating.
6. Did the other cryptocurrency projects you made video tutorials for also pay for their production?
No. My approach has been to create 66 blockchain tutorials for free first, to then leverage this work portfolio as my Proof-Of-Skill so that I can approach projects like Dash with my proposal.
Please let me know if you have any questions or suggestions about my proposal.
submitted by DenniLovejoy to dashpay [link] [comments]

IRC Log from Ravencoin Open Developer Meeting - Sept 7, 2018

Hi all
Greetings and salutations!
two is a good number for lips
sup
how do you dooski?
{|}
Jesse is not going to make it.
master
salut
so what is todays topic
Yes, who's moderating? Announcements, etc.
well i guess thats chatturgas job
but hes not here so idk
I'm a poor substitute for Jesse. I'm moderating today.
lol
Just FYI, there is a testnet5 with unique assets. Build from release_2.0.5 branch.
Are we able to connect to the testnet v5 seed nodes?
Yes. Testnet seed nodes are working now.
Yes. Testnet5 seed nodes are working now.
https://medium.com/@Tronblack/ravencoin-asset-issuance-cost-52b553c507cb
Medium
Ravencoin — Asset Issuance Cost – Tron Black – Medium
Let me start by thanking everybody in the community that has passionately contributed thoughts and ideas on the economics of asset…
looks like im compiling the binaries lol
I wrote a blog post about the pros/cons of the various burn options.
If anyone wants to weigh-in on their preference.
Because of the simplicity, I lean towards the first two options listed.
2.0.5 isn't going to be put on the webpage as an official binary release is that right?
Yes, that's right.
But, I'd encourage anyone to build it and run it on testnet5
i personally prefer the halvening option
@russkidooski With a particular floor?
yep
500->250->125
the best option isn't listed, POM
tl what's POM?
Proof of Market
ah
zaab is the author and just joined
Yes
Hi Boo and Zaab
Also "Prisoner Of her Majesty"
Sorry on vacation so not all in on this conversation but felt it was importsnt to join
Hey Zaab, welcome!
Hi all. Just observing. Hope no one minds.
Thanks for taking the time to write that article Zaab, it was very thought provoking.
Hi s&l
If anything, that was its main purpose
hello
I prepped some questions i had before i realized i could make it
great
1. Why was a burn deemed necessary at all? What is the purpose of it? 2. How/why was the number 500 chosen. Was an economic analysis ran? Or was an analyzis done on how many assests could be reasonably handled (thus needed an asset amount cap)
3. Tell me the truth, how likely are you to impliment any alternative idea. Are we wasting our time making our cases?
Shotgun!
being in favor becauseit is simplicity is not a plan for success; POM is fairly simple and will give a true market pricing
And i dont mean nust my own
Just*
any code contribution with ideas would be appreciated and tested.
That's a lot of questions.
Burning RVN helps the economics of the coin. Fewer circulating supply (more scarcity) the higher the value of the coin (assuming all else equal).
Also, there should be a cost to creating asset names in the namespace.
that is only half the economic formula
Burn is necessary because there must be a cost to consume the resources of the network.
hi bw
I didnt realize making the coin economical was one of the purposes of the coin
We could've recycled the RVN back through the miners (like fees), but the burn economics should help RVN price.
IMHO, all the well designed coins have a good economic model behind them.
Also sorry i would code it if i could but im not a programmer, if that invalidates my ideas so be it
It doesn't Zaab
recycle seems much more complex than POM
Because you tie good economics to a good mining base which is what ultimately is needed for security
It doesn't invalidate your ideas, but some of the complexities introduced with your ideas may not be feasible before Oct 1 (RC goal date).
simplicity/predictability is the guiderail here on burn vs recycle
This is deadline does not feel healthy
The ideas in POM, which I'll address in a minute also cause some issues.
launch deadline should not be more important than a successful launch design
agreed!
My preference is burn with diminishing price over time.
When creating an asset, all nodes must agree on the price, and if that changes each block (or frequently), there may be issues. The signed transaction may sit in the mempool waiting for confirmation and the "price" in RVN may change.
To me a burn has 2 purposes only. One prevent a spam attack and two for the transaction id of the burn to act as a signature of authenticity of an asset
Zaab I'll tell the truth -- we want the best solution, but for all parties including application developers. Project planners like being able to budget and whole numbers.
simple is better
fix the price daily based on an avg; could taht solve
we don't want the nightmare of eth gas
The authenticity isn't an issue, because there are other ways to handle it.
What ive proposed at its maximum only increases under 2 rvn per day. Thats well within planning limits
@twolips An average of what?
POM formula being based on an avg of max burn and daily burn numbers
@Zaab If I understood your paper correctly (not a given) then it seems like the cost went down as more assets were created. Is that the case, or did I misunderstand the chart.
that ius healthy
^^
at that point, the value of RVN will increase
As assets are created the remaining burnable rvn drops. Thus price drops
because of function not scarcity
As rvn are mined the remaining burnable rvn increases thus price increases
POM seemed to show higher burnrate, lower RVN cost (-10 RVN delta).
hi X_K
hi
You need to burn 3,600,000 rvn daily just to keep up with mining. POM will almost certainly cause price to increase
That seems backwards to me -- from an economic standpoint.
Just like crypto is deflationary, its backwarsa
Backwards
So if fewer people are creating assets, the price increases?
sdrawkcaB
Yep
blink
That seems counterintuitive to the project tho
How so
To me, price determines demand, not the other way around
Again -- that seems backwards. "Nobody is coming into our store, now we have to sell these sofas for a $1,000,000"
Thought the whole idea of rvn was asset creation
there are 2 aspects, cost of creation and value of RVN
But theres no maximim to sofas in the world you could always make more
both cause moves
Not the case with rvn
What do you all think about the 5-4-3-2-1 model?
If not many are being created, the cost of creation should be lower.
The value of RVN is closely tied to mining hash rate, but not correlated with number of asset names created.
you sell the for 1,000,000 but that is in Venezuelan bolívar
bad example
@boodog The purpose of RVN is assets. Not necessarily asset issuance.
As far as mempool blockage i envisioned something similar to mining difficulty calculation. Where it checks the previous assets created in comparison to the current one within a valid range
Tron_: thanks for clarification
I expect lots of assets to be created, but even better would be some really quality assets with real use cases and transactions on the nodes.
How many assets can the network currently handle?
More than the real world needs
More then 42million?
none compare to POM
As coded, 6000 per block for issuances.
But those issuances would squeeze out transactions.
Ok
@zabb that would mean that some transactions in the mempool would be valid and some wouldn't because they were created at different time.
42million is maximum not including sub assets or unqiue assets or reissuing
If we hit high loads, there are some scalability improvements we can make.
Ya that part of the idea isnt fully worked out but i dont know whats techicnally possible
True, as coded 42,000,000 root level assets is a max.
42MM is not accurate because as some point there is a breaking point where we price ourselves out of business
I meant if we had 42mil assets could the network support it
Lots more, sub-level assets. So a market could form under "COM" for example.
hi Skan
@twolips the question was how much can the network handle. not pricing
demand for the rare RVN will be expensive and competition will come in with a much better idea
Hi everybody
and 42MM was mention as max...not a true number
@Zaab It could issue them, but transaction volume has its limits at about 20x what Bitcoin does (sans Lightning).
Also again how did the number 500 come up? Did you do an econmic analysis or is it set based on max workload of the network
the breaking point is probably, at best, near half of that
if you haven't, you should all read zaab's proposal
options 5,4,3,2,1 can not be fairly comment ed on withot reading POM
Link please?
https://medium.com/@Zaab/ravencoin-proof-of-market-an-asset-issuance-cost-alternative-c5b6f9457acf
Medium
Ravencoin — Proof of Market: An Asset Issuance Cost Alternative
9/5/2018 — In response to “Ravencoin — Asset Issuance Cost” by Tron Black
Ty
Hitting the maximum number of asset is not nearly as worrisome nor pressing of an issue as the economic design , in my opinion
discord #burn-discussion as ongoing convo on this topic
Ive got to go, id like the 3 questions i posted earlier answered if possible. Ill be around if anyone has any questions.
POM would be more compelling if there was a (-) in there somewhere.
Depending on question 3 i will be willing to write 2 more papers
One attacking my own idea
When I foresee obstacles in the future for RVN having used the coin to it's maximum potential is very low on the list
One defending it
Bye!
Take care everyone! Thank you for all the hard work!
peace
Later Zaab
Thanks Zaab!
To hit maximum number of assets and not be able to issue anymore means that RVN worked to the highest extent
it's hard to model; it's hard to predict
but there will be no adoption if budgeting isn't easy for application developers
imo
eth gas is a nightmare
true
The NASDAQ has ~3,300 companies on it. For reference and understanding this means if the NASDAQ completely converts all its companies to RVN, the total RVN burned will be….. ~1,650,000 or roughly 22% of the total RVN mined daily (until halving). Therefore, the amount of RVN burned will unlikely have any effect on the value of RVN if the proposed system is allowed to pass.
not only market flux but the MATHS
We will never come anywhere near that if the economic design makes it unappealing to issue assets on RVN. A decay to the cost as a safeguard against having become too expensive against dollars or investment of resources to model is necessary. Making so we can issue more assets than our wildwst dreams is a much lower priority and doesn't even matter unless the rest is figured out
Resources to mine*
i stand by the halvening model with a minimum
simple and effective
what about all the other assets we want to be tokenized
The most attractive thing to big time players is security, which implies hashrate, which implies value, which implies adoption (buy pressure)..
vehicles, land deeds, gold bars....
I think halving should be a safeguard not a regular thing, so iirc the chain has ways of knowing how many assets are being issued. I say we only even trigger an upcoming happening if assets being issued grinds to a halt, indicating price issues
I'm on halvening too althought I like the 5-4-3-2-1 flavor
Otherwise whatever the burn fee is is working fine, no reason to just always half it without context
halving is a sharp cost adjustment...talk about bidgeting issues
DGW for asset? lol
POm smooths this out
@skan that would allow people to attack the network by now issuing assets. forcing a halving
no Skan it needs to be predictable to normals because planning/budgeting
not*
the worse thing we can do is design limitations into the project
As it stands it costs 18 cents to issue assets on ethereum. Say what you will about the quality or lack of features, it's still a factor that we are competing against. Obviously RVN is different because there are only so many unique asset names and it has more complex and easier to use features, so it should be more expensive. But we are already starting our nearly x100 before we even go live
twolips it's not an algorithm -- it needs to interact with buyers/users or it's worthless
Skan yeah and did you read that smart contract code?
You're getting into ???
we're UTXO
i know
i dont know algos, i know user
thats the perspective i come from
You don't have to, their browser automatically singles out the important variables for you to change
yeah user want's cheap/easy
and predictable
@Tron what is your preference?
Why is Roshii so quiet? ;)
I say we code in a burn fee halvening that only triggers itself if no assets or very few assets have been issued for an extended period of time
relaxing from a talking section
@skan again that allows the network to the attacked
In this order: 500 RVN -> 500 RVN with halvening and 125 floor -> 500 RVN with 20% drop from original price each halvening.
@skan That doesn't work
when does it half?
@Tron Thnx
skan; have you read POM, kinda does that
Every 2,100,000 blocks. Should be roughly 4 years.
I'm on (3) in tron's list but (1) is ok too
Interesting, how so?
you have to read it
POM is not that -- it would be that with a (-) somewhere..
@skan, user, or miners wouldn't accepts asset transaction into blocks. Which would trigger a halving.
What @CORbie means is that the economics of POM as written seem backwards.
@skan, I'm not saying that would happen. But it is an easy attack vector that we can avoid.
The best part about flat rate of 500 is that if it becomes an issues down the road when more variables are known, we can reevaluate changing to a cheaper model.
Why make asset name creation cheaper when lots of names are being created?
^^
i think we are redesigning an economic model, that is the beauty
sounds like a recipe for spamming the network
a spam recipe? sounds dubious.. :)
again there are 2 values; the cost of creation and the value of a RVN
Absolutely should get more expensive or stay flat with high demand, not cheaper.
the halvening model tron is talking about seems to be the simplest and most predictable
^^
There is an interesting case study with the fixed cost to create a proposal in Dash. It was 5 Dash. That was really cheap at the time (under $5). The same 5 Dash went to $8000.
yes Russ -- the thing the 5-4-3-2-1 adds is legibility/budgetability to app developers (I don't think that's a word)
They haven't changed it, but there were solutions that were built around it.
if a lot are being created, RVN is succeeding, demand increases, RVN cost per creation goes down as value increases...keeping it affordable for all that desire to tokenize assets
And, the value of a Dash proposal went way up when the masternodes were kicking out millions.
Halvening model is my preference
how are we going to vote this?
on discord?
halving on a time schedule will not give a true market value
RVN already has market value
@twolips, you are associating asset creation to rvn value increasing. It doesn't work that way. It is almost always difficulty -> value increasing
@russkidooski By writing and running code :)
frog; you seem to be speaking from a miners perspective
A vote would be interesting - not binding - but really interesting.
the devs have a preference and people will ultimately follow them
@twolips, i am speaking from the perspective that the only thing that holds value is being able to make sure that the value is secure.
the devs have a preference and people MAY follow them
the devs.. those guys..
Would be interesting but could cause community issues if not chosen by devs. I am for no voting. Write and run code.
it is a complex issue; votes should only occur after big discussion
BW agree
let's take an informal vote now
Votes are never needed.
here it is
i vote for pizza
type 1 for 500, 2 for half, 3 for 5-4-3-2-1, 4 for POM, 5 for other
go
3
which one is the 5-4-3-2-1?
i forgot
and this is why no cvote should occure
20% discount at each halving.
like half but -20% orig value
o yea i like that one
3
not famil with the plan
20% discount at each halving. 500->400->300->200->100
Unique asset issuance cost 5->4->3->2->1
russ, how well do you know POM?
Nice round numbers.
not crazy well
but enough
i need to read up on it more
POM seems backwards to me.
same
have you read the proposal?
@twolips Are you recommending POM with the economics as written, or the opposite economics?
this is all backwards
6 (-) POM
yes
well
i see 2 votes
no but it is a great starting point
you guys are so opinionated!
the variables need to be analysed
KISS 54321
ok! there's #3
any more informal non-binding votes?
Is 3 winning?
3 has 3
no other votes
the beauty is when the cost of creation goes down, say to .05 RVN, the value of RVN will be 1,000
VeronicaBOTLast Friday at 3:00 PM
exaggerated for demenstration
if cost goe to 1kRVN, the value willbe .05
^^
twolips. Are you saying that as more assets are created the price decreases?
brb
not the 'price', the cost of creation, yes
okay.
there needs to be a thorough analysis of POM
in the beginning of the #burn-discussion, there are some simple spread sheet examples
but with zaabs proposal it is backwards
how so
more assets being created > price for creation goes down
that is just asking the network to be spammed
So, that only works if the price of raven in the real world follows it. If not, the cost of creation will get lower, and people will start to be able to spam the network with assets.
^
This will make the nodes use more databasing and memory to run RVN.
This is bad ^^
and if a node isnt in sync you can get a lot of problems
this keeps the reation cost stable...great for customer acqusition
but it isnt technically feasable, we dont want the problems ethereum has
can that be cured with avging?
So because it is good for customer aqusition it is okay? Even if it is bad for the network?
daily, weekly,monthy? avgs to adjust cost of creation?
a opposed to what zaab said; each transaction, cost changes?
Lot's of talk but only 3 votes?
type 1 for 500, 2 for half, 3 for 5-4-3-2-1, 4 for POM, 5 for other
6 (-) POM
the POM seems to be a simple formula to be coded in (maybe naive)
i vote 3 if my vote counts, i feel like it has to be a set number, it would be easy to change if needed in future.
idk about network issues
@xiztak agreed
there's 4 for #3 with no other voes -- make it 5
X changing it in the future shows a centralized coin
how
who makes that decision
3 but I'm not for voting
community
and when
it's informal BW just taking temp
community is talkin about it now
and voting
for a set number
uninformed
outline for me vote 2?
haha
haha
2 is following the halvening of coinbase -- 500 250 125 to some floor
1 o 3
of course the 500 magic number is up for debate in 1,2,3..
I agree it would be good to know where 500 came from.
Meaning the thinking behind that exact number
i suggest nybody serious about the importance of this topic, to join the active convo
Maybe @Tron_ can tell a story but it's just (starting_block_reward/10) in my mind..
important to the success of all your hard work
twolips I don't know what that means -- you mean Discord or something?
as far as i know, that is the most active
or do you mean there are like 4 cats in here?
why people in Discord when we here? talk about shouting at clouds..
5000 per block so 500 per aseet creation so 10% of mined coins per block? maybe
^^
interesting
@twolips is there a floor that the cost of issuance would get to on POM?
if attacked it could be 0 or 1 then its game over
seems in the rough spreadsht examples
corbie; here once a week...startin 3 weeks ago
and it's been fun!
a lot more fun in discord
i'm hjere al week...tip ur waitresses
-_-
Is there anything more we are going to discuss?
maybe Xiz concept may fit into POM
need zaab to think about
Nothing on my agenda -- final informal vote seems to favor 5-4-3-2-1
no real support for POM (zorry zaab)
Thanks everyone!
wow, an uninformed vote...impressive
you vote?
what's your vote twolips I don't think I got it
this vote is informal, it means nothing really
^^
exactly
so you don't want to make an informal meaningless vote twolips?
i case u haven't noticed...team POM
ok!!
but (-) or no?
because as is it makes no sense as many of us have pointed out..
haha
many uninformed
..
4 cats i think u called them
I can read and do basic math..
that was just a reference to nobody being here..
write up a retort to zaabs propasal explainin (-); would love to seeit
I like the idea of using ratio of coinbase to burn to set market, just has it in wrong direction
And I'm a (3) guy so don't think we want market anyway..
POM is a self regulating federal reserve
revolutionary and RVN could intro it to the world
Thanks for the discussion everyone -- I'm signing off. Buy RVN!
hope you are all putting a lil more thought into this...could be make or break
@twolips. We are 100% putting lots of thought into this
@twolips This is something that is very important to RVN
i know...hence my passion
and I truely believe POM can be revolutionary
It could be, sure. There are lots of different good option though tbh.
bring thm up...lets out the community to work
a lot of eager minds
POM needs to be more thoroughly developed
we also need working prototypes
it started with fixed burn number and progressed
Can someone point me to a good readup on POM
bring in some thoughts
#burn-discussion on discord
i (vincent) invited you on rvntalk
We're done thank you
submitted by Chatturga to Ravencoin [link] [comments]

Subreddit Stats: btc top posts from 2015-11-07 to 2018-12-03 19:07 PDT

Period: 1122.63 days
Submissions Comments
Total 1000 177195
Rate (per day) 0.89 157.49
Unique Redditors 537 19498
Combined Score 606295 1044009

Top Submitters' Top Submissions

  1. 28637 points, 50 submissions: Egon_1
    1. bitcoin mods removed top post: "The rich don't need Bitcoin. The poor do" (4810 points, 506 comments)
    2. WSJ: "[bitcoin core] fees have reached an average cost of about $30 per transaction. That makes bitcoin virtually unusable for all but very large transactions. The Bitcoin Cash crowd is just trying to offer a solution to that problem." (1305 points, 338 comments)
    3. Friendly reminder that the LiteCoin ($36) founder sold 100% of his coins as it ran up to $300 while wearing a HODL shirt for video interviews. (1192 points, 293 comments)
    4. Rick Falkvinge:"Fun fact: I am aware of a truckload of companies currently in the process of converting from Bitcoin Legacy to #Bitcoin Cash. I am aware of zero (0) companies going the other direction." (657 points, 226 comments)
    5. "Bitcoin.com wallet now displays "Bitcoin Cash" and "Bitcoin Core" balances. Should satisfy everyone, right? ;)" (627 points, 444 comments)
    6. GDAX: "We will open the BCH-BTC Order Book on Wednesday, January 17 at 9:00 am PST." (618 points, 112 comments)
    7. Stephen (BitPay CEO):"a typical #bitcoin transaction costs $1.80 now, >200k unconfirmed transactions, time for a hard fork to larger blocks ... 8mb please" (544 points, 113 comments)
    8. Erik Voorhees: "Changing Bitcoin's proof-of-work to prevent miners from mining is the most absurd and reckless thing I've heard in the scaling debate." (539 points, 171 comments)
    9. Erik Voorhees: "Fellow Bitcoiners, are you ever going to realize how problematic these fees are getting? Avg fees now over $40 per tx. A year ago avg fee was $4. A year prior, $0.40. Growing faster than price, and exponentially with usage. We just spent $4800 to move 15 BTC in one TX." (539 points, 147 comments)
    10. BitPay CEO: “If people can’t engage in commerce, it’s hard to imagine why they’d want to store their money in Bitcoin in the first place” (537 points, 133 comments)
  2. 26883 points, 56 submissions: MemoryDealers
    1. I'm Roger Ver, CEO of Bitcoin.com and world's first investor in Bitcoin startups. AMA (978 points, 932 comments)
    2. The pro Bitcoin Cash video from CNBC made it to the very front page of Yahoo.com! (858 points, 189 comments)
    3. I (Roger Ver) will be doing an AMA on Monday Dec 18th starting at 10AM EST on /BTC because /Bitcoin is completely censored. (826 points, 412 comments)
    4. Reminder: Blockstream and Core got 100% of everything they asked for. (807 points, 332 comments)
    5. I'm giving away $100 each of BCH and BTC on live TV tomorrow by displaying the private key. Guess why? (738 points, 827 comments)
    6. How wrong were they? More than 2 years ago the CEO of Lightning Labs said LN would be ready in less than 6 months (695 points, 275 comments)
    7. To the Censorship loving tyrants in /Bitcoin, don't Say Bitcoin.com didn't warn you! "In the unlikely event that the 2MB block size increase portion of Segwit2x fails to activate, Bitcoin.com will immediately shift all company resources to supporting Bitcoin Cash exclusively." (672 points, 363 comments)
    8. Sign the Petition for Clemency for Ross Ulbricht, Serving Double Life for a Website (663 points, 227 comments)
    9. I just bet 1,000 BTC (~$4M USD) that Segwit 2X coin will have more value than Segwit 1x coin. (644 points, 398 comments)
    10. If you think consumers are going to throw away $100’s (and soon $1000’s) on transaction fees to open up a payment channel on the Lightning network, you are delusional. (599 points, 219 comments)
  3. 12737 points, 26 submissions: hunk_quark
    1. Censored! Youtube removes Roger Ver's video on "The effects of Censorship and Propaganda upon Bitcoin" (1002 points, 296 comments)
    2. CNBC is waking up (886 points, 144 comments)
    3. Despite massing brigading from bitcoin and core, @Bitcoin twitter account has gained 50k subscribers since it came out in support of BCH last week. (627 points, 197 comments)
    4. Warren Buffet's Berkshire is the single largest stockholder in BoA and WellsFargo. In case you were wondering about his attitude towards Bitcoin. (619 points, 113 comments)
    5. Bitfinex defines Bitcoin Cash as the coin that fulfills the original promise of p2p cash, a bitcoin upgrade that is ready to scale and sound money! #Winning (599 points, 164 comments)
    6. Wouldn't wanna be this shopper. (581 points, 124 comments)
    7. GDAX enabling EUBCH trading pair next week. #winning 🎆 (572 points, 66 comments)
    8. Thank to this community's effort, Forbes has corrected Kyle's Torpey's LN article to clarify LTC tx fees is much higher than BCH. Now let's ask for 1 more correction: Bitcoin cash is not Bcash. Links in comments. (508 points, 173 comments)
    9. Elizabeth Stark of Lightning labs calls out Blockstream on letting users tinker with LN that's neither safe nor ready for mainnet. (490 points, 266 comments)
    10. The $2000 tip for Bitcoin ABC dev shows we don't need blockstream to pay our developers, we can do community funding through tippr! (463 points, 131 comments)
  4. 12410 points, 23 submissions: BitcoinXio
    1. /bitcoin is censoring the NIST report that says "Bitcoin Cash is the original blockchain" and Bitcoin Core is not. If you have to censor to get people to believe you, then you have lost. (855 points, 496 comments)
    2. Free_Ross on Twitter: "ALL charges of murder-for-hire vs. Ross are now dropped. After almost 5 years, gov't has moved to dismiss final MD indictment based on evidence from corrupt agent now in prison." (759 points, 211 comments)
    3. Someone hacked the account todu which was a mod here to point users to /bitcoin (732 points, 259 comments)
    4. Former /cryptocurrency mod: "I used to be a mod of cryptocurrency until they kicked me out. Now, that sub, is controlled all by mods with accounts less than 7 months old!" (724 points, 214 comments)
    5. Congrats: /btc has reached 150,000 subscribers! (696 points, 356 comments)
    6. Twitter continues to go downhill - flags @Bitcoin account as ‘temporarily restricted due to unusual activity’ (635 points, 216 comments)
    7. There is a huge edit war on Wikipedia where trolls like the user "Jtbobwaysf" are trying very hard to inject the word "bcash" into Bitcoin Cash pages and reverting/editing other pages that speak factually poorly on topics such as Lightning Network, Segwit, etc. (622 points, 148 comments)
    8. What /bitcoin mods desperately don't want you to see! (601 points, 104 comments)
    9. /btc is trending on reddit today, congrats everyone! (586 points, 18 comments)
    10. Bitcoin Cash is upgrading on May 15 to 32MB max block limit (579 points, 334 comments)
  5. 11766 points, 16 submissions: BeijingBitcoins
    1. Average Bitcoin transaction fee is now above five dollars. 80% of the world population lives on less than $10 a day. So much for "banking the unbanked." (3417 points, 463 comments)
    2. Dear Reddit Admins: We need to talk about /Bitcoin (1342 points, 280 comments)
    3. Paid for this whisky with Bitcoin Cash! Ginza bar becomes third Tokyo retail establishment to accept BCC (747 points, 60 comments)
    4. Samson Mow says Bitcoin isn't for people earning less than $2 a day. With average transaction fees now at $27.20, is Bitcoin even for people earning less than $100 a day? (659 points, 160 comments)
    5. Protip: If you are new to Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general, you really should read the document that started it all, the Bitcoin whitepaper [PDF] (642 points, 69 comments)
    6. With the public spotlight on Reddit censorship, now would be the perfect time to let the rest of Reddit know about the censorship on /bitcoin (641 points, 121 comments)
    7. /Bitcoin in a nutshell (531 points, 68 comments)
    8. Three years ago today, Mike Hearn published an article explaining exactly what would happen when the 1MB blocksize limit was hit. He was right on all counts. (483 points, 168 comments)
    9. Shit, they're on to us (449 points, 65 comments)
    10. "Am I so out of touch?" (443 points, 164 comments)
  6. 9301 points, 2 submissions: censorship_notifier
    1. Evidence that the mods of /Bitcoin may have been involved with the hacking and vote manipulation "attack" on /Bitcoin. (8585 points, 1166 comments)
    2. New anti-censorship bot for /bitcoin (716 points, 345 comments)
  7. 7980 points, 16 submissions: increaseblocks
    1. No Neo I'm trying to tell you ... (706 points, 77 comments)
    2. Blockstream is falling apart - Greg Maxwell resigns - Blockstream takes down team page in a hurry to reorg team - Adam Back must be worried (675 points, 492 comments)
    3. * Ripple is not mineable (it is a centralized private blockchain run by banks) (622 points, 254 comments)
    4. rBitcoin moderator confesses and comes clean that Blockstream is only trying to make a profit by exploiting Bitcoin and pushing users off chain onto sidechains (578 points, 188 comments)
    5. Blockstream investor emails leaked - shows Blockstream motivation to steal transaction fees from miners and pay to Liquid sidechain customers (539 points, 250 comments)
    6. Fixed - Bitcoin Cash moving money far better. SegWitCoin moving money with high fees and slow confirmation times! (532 points, 105 comments)
    7. Vitalik Buterin says what we've all been saying - CoinDesk is scammy and complicit bad actor in the cryptocurrency world and should be shunned (505 points, 59 comments)
    8. "Blockstream plans to sell side chains to enterprises, charging a fixed monthly fee, taking transaction fees and even selling hardware" source- Adam Back Blockstream CEO (498 points, 143 comments)
    9. Coinbase comes through and does the correct thing and adds clarification on the upcoming Segwit2x Fork (454 points, 194 comments)
    10. Core trolls have hard decisions to make (437 points, 140 comments)
  8. 7772 points, 1 submission: PedanticPendant
    1. The idiocracy of bitcoin (7772 points, 750 comments)
  9. 7763 points, 13 submissions: jessquit
    1. You can now store a year's worth of continuously full 8MB blocks for the cost of a single BTC transaction (1378 points, 386 comments)
    2. There never was a "scaling problem." The only problem is "people that don't want Bitcoin to scale." (772 points, 419 comments)
    3. Please stop saying "Increase the block size" (660 points, 449 comments)
    4. [PSA] If your Bitcoin are not ready-to-transact in a wallet whose keys you exclusively control, then you don't control your Bitcoin (622 points, 215 comments)
    5. Why us old-school Bitcoiners argue that Bitcoin Cash should be considered "the real Bitcoin" (587 points, 586 comments)
    6. I think we need an EDA fix before the Nov hardfork (541 points, 345 comments)
    7. Why large blocks: because one man's "coffee purchase transaction" is another man's monthly income (501 points, 104 comments)
    8. This sub is under major attack (494 points, 319 comments)
    9. There is a word for a "store of value" with no underlying utility, and that word is "collectible" (481 points, 169 comments)
    10. Ripple user comes to defend Ripple, gets hundreds of upvotes, but can't answer the most fundamental question: what prevents inflation? (459 points, 404 comments)
  10. 7400 points, 16 submissions: Windowly
    1. "If BCH hashpower > BTC, I'll start referring to it as just 'Bitcoin' :" ~ Gavin on twitter (778 points, 238 comments)
    2. You want to go grab a coffee?? (642 points, 413 comments)
    3. "I guess my idea of "freedom from corrupt banks" didn't include transaction fees that forced 99% of the world's population to keep using banks."~Erik Voorhees (603 points, 122 comments)
    4. "Bitcoin needs multiple clients and independent developer groups. There were 0-days in Microsoft Windows for two decades despite billions spent on development. Cut new teams some slack as they ramp up." ~Cornell Professor and Bitcoin researcher Emin Gün Sirer (506 points, 91 comments)
    5. "With recent developments, I'm putting all available dev resources to retool my software for #Bitcoin Cash. I suspect I'm far from alone."~Rick Falkvinge (Pirate Party) (493 points, 134 comments)
    6. "We've tested Bitcoin Cash vs Lightning Network and... LN feels so unnecessary and over-complicated. Also, still more expensive than Bitcoin Cash fees - and that's not taking into account the $3 fees each way you open or close a $50 channel. Also two different balances? Confusing" ~ HandCash (461 points, 252 comments)
    7. That Awkward Moment. . . . (429 points, 129 comments)
    8. "There was an entire mall in 2013 to 2015 in Berlin that accepted Bitcoin. This stopped when fees rose. There was wide adoption once. Fees kill use"~Dr. Craig S. Wright (424 points, 150 comments)
    9. Bitcoin Cash finally released on Open Bazaar! (420 points, 36 comments)
    10. "Billion-dollar corporations take note: Bitcoin Cash is open for business! Just try to fill up our blocks, I dare you. There will be no "Fidelity Effect" with BCH. Unlike BTC, we want you to use the Blockchain. BCH never really hits a scale ceiling."~Dr. Peter Rizun (413 points, 177 comments)
  11. 6980 points, 1 submission: boomtnt46
    1. As of today, Steam will no longer support Bitcoin as a payment method (6980 points, 1178 comments)
  12. 6385 points, 9 submissions: rdar1999
    1. South Koreans sign petition (100k signatures) to reject ban proposal and 30k signatures asking to FIRE the Justice Minister and the Finance Minister for market manipulation. Crypto is winning!! (1863 points, 117 comments)
    2. BREAKING NEWS: South Korean Government confirms NO CRYPTO BAN. What they will do is to enforce regulations, anti money laundering task force, anti market manipulation, the usual stuff. (1085 points, 51 comments)
    3. Friendly reminder: Vitalik "I consider BCH a legitimate contender for the bitcoin name." (794 points, 181 comments)
    4. Shutting down or restricting the uses of bank accounts, thereby forbidding clients to buy crypto, is a blatant affront to the rights of civil liberty, manifested, but not limited to, in the rights to private property and free speech (562 points, 262 comments)
    5. GDAX: Bitcoin Cash Launch Retrospective -- trades were halted after 3 minutes because THE STASH DRIED OUT DUE TO AN AVALANCHE OF BUY ORDERS (485 points, 162 comments)
    6. While Jamie Dimon is shutting down your accounts, Russia’s largest State Bank is about to open cryptocurrency exchange In europe (439 points, 38 comments)
    7. Flippening: blockexplorer.com says: "We have made the decision to support the only bitcoin fork with a postive utility momentum, which is Bitcoin Cash.(...) We will not add future support for the Blockstream fork of bitcoin ("Bitcoin Legacy"), and will be deprecating it entirely " (428 points, 110 comments)
    8. National Institute of Standards and Technology confirm: "Bitcoin Core (BTC) is a fork and Bitcoin Cash (BCH) is the real Bitcoin" p.43 para 8.1.2 (372 points, 115 comments)
    9. TABGATE==> the astroturfing/hired shills scandal. Adam Back let it slip he hires full-time teams of social media shills/trolls. Just read! (357 points, 271 comments)
  13. 6162 points, 7 submissions: normal_rc
    1. Legacy Bitcoin tries to buy a cup of coffee (2305 points, 499 comments)
    2. WARNING: Brutal scam. Guy buys a Ledger Nano wallet on Ebay, and it steals all his cryptocurrency ($34,000, which is his life's savings). (1479 points, 522 comments)
    3. How the Bilderberg Group, the Federal Reserve central bank, and MasterCard took over Bitcoin BTC. (589 points, 220 comments)
    4. Cryptocurrency usually automatically downvotes any pro-BCH thread into oblivion. But I got my CoinText.io post to trend to #3 on their front page, by simply not saying "Bitcoin Cash". Proof that people would love BCH if they kept an open mind. (542 points, 202 comments)
    5. Tor Project can accept small donations again, thanks to Bitcoin Cash. (458 points, 35 comments)
    6. 100,000+ Merchants Start Accepting Bitcoin Cash. More than 100,000 BitPay merchants are now accepting Bitcoin Cash with the option seemingly automatically turned on for all of them. (416 points, 108 comments)
    7. Bitpay announcement: Electron Cash wallet now fully supports Bitpay BIP70 payment invoices for Bitcoin Cash. (373 points, 37 comments)
  14. 6023 points, 12 submissions: BitcoinIsTehFuture
    1. “Graphene” is a new Bitcoin block propagation technology that is 10x more efficient than Core’s “Compact Blocks”! Created by: Gavin Andresen, A. Pinar Ozisik, George Bissias, Amir Houmansadr, Brian Neil Levine. (717 points, 224 comments)
    2. Just so you guys know: Ethereum just had another successful hardfork network upgrade. Blockstream is wrong when they say you cannot hard fork to improve things. (655 points, 398 comments)
    3. Western Union vs. Bitcoin vs. Bitcoin Cash (625 points, 102 comments)
    4. This was an orchestrated attack. (574 points, 373 comments)
    5. It's called "Bitcoin Cash". The term "Bcash" is a social attack run by bitcoin. Not joking. Here is the full explanation, with proof. (567 points, 310 comments)
    6. On a reply I made in bitcoin that had over 350 upvotes, I was first somehow blocked from being able to reply on bitcoin and then actually banned when I edited my comment to state that I was blocked from replying. (502 points, 99 comments)
    7. The /bitconnect subreddit just got set to private! Bitconnect experienced a 90% drop, from over $300 down to $26! The scam has gone belly up at last! (447 points, 168 comments)
    8. Bitcoin Core Dev "Luke-jr" is asked why he is interested in Bitcoin. This is one of the main people in charge of Bitcoin right now. (405 points, 383 comments)
    9. I believe Bitcoin Core/Blockstream is now attempting to infiltrate Bitcoin Cash in the same manner that they did with Bitcoin Segwit. They are suddenly befriending Bitcoin Cash. Only in that way can they destroy from within. Do not be fooled. (401 points, 166 comments)
    10. #NOTX (390 points, 56 comments)
  15. 5329 points, 1 submission: 11111101000
    1. Buy, sell, send and receive Bitcoin Cash on Coinbase (5329 points, 1019 comments)
  16. 5147 points, 2 submissions: peptocurrency
    1. Guess who controls over half a billion Tethers across 3 exchanges—over 73% of USDT currently in circulation. (4748 points, 635 comments)
    2. Dear Bitcoin: You're right. BTC has been attacked. (399 points, 107 comments)
  17. 5098 points, 9 submissions: btcnewsupdates
    1. Starbucks CEO Wants Crypto. Considering All Currencies Except Bitcoin Core (BTC): "It is not a currency today nor will it be in the future” (820 points, 218 comments)
    2. Roger Ver: "Dear @reddit, [...] I'll pay you $100,000 USD if you simply appoint a moderator to /Bitcoin who supports free speech." (804 points, 424 comments)
    3. Hundreds of botted accounts mixed with some real ones simultaneously post "Bitcoin Cash is Trash" on twitter. Blockstream reaching sheer desperation status. (719 points, 281 comments)
    4. Overstock accepts Bitcoin Cash - BCH holders can now buy Home Goods, Bed & Bath Essentials, Jewellery & More! (591 points, 115 comments)
    5. ProtonMail asking for community assistance to enable Bitcoin Cash payments (538 points, 86 comments)
    6. WooCommerce brings Bitcoin Cash (BCH) to its 380,000 online retailers. (474 points, 98 comments)
    7. A Bitcoin Entrepreneur Jonathan Hamel knowingly misleads a Canadian Parliamentary committee to smear Bitcoin Cash (BCH). More Lawlessness from Bitcoin/Lightning (399 points, 193 comments)
    8. Largest Sports Gambling Site in the World, Bovada, now Accepts BCH. Billions of dollars in transactions a year (388 points, 60 comments)
    9. Bitcoin Cash support on OpenBazaar now live (365 points, 43 comments)
  18. 4698 points, 7 submissions: cryptorebel
    1. You have $100 worth of BTC. So you purchase an item for $66, but have to pay a $17 fee. Now you have $17 worth of Bitcoin left, but it costs $17 more to move it. So $66 item effectively cost you $100. #Thanks BlockStream (1420 points, 433 comments)
    2. President of SBI Holdings: "The vision of the original Bitcoin white paper written by Satoshi Nakamoto calls for a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. That is a powerful vision, and SBI Group will devote resources to enable a future world where Bitcoin Cash is used globally for daily payments." (843 points, 81 comments)
    3. They used to use Bitcoin... (738 points, 176 comments)
    4. Elizabeth Stark of Lightning Labs admits that a hostile actor can steal funds in LN unless you broadcast a transaction on-chain with a cryptographic proof that recovers the funds. This means LN won't work without a block size limit increase. @8min17s (494 points, 433 comments)
    5. CEO of Bitcoin.com Roger Ver challenges Samson Mow to a debate once again, will Samson refuse again? The reason small blockers do not debate and need censorship is because they know their arguments cannot stand up to scrutiny. (426 points, 208 comments)
    6. Update from BitGo: "Due to strong customer interest BitGo will enable full support of Bitcoin Cash" (407 points, 25 comments)
    7. BitPay CEO hints at possible Bitcoin Cash acceptance: "We do listen to our customers and for quite some time their number 1 complaint has been the high fees and slow confirmation times. We really don't like to pre-announce things though. Things move fast and plans can change at the last minute. " (370 points, 73 comments)
  19. 4339 points, 6 submissions: Anenome5
    1. Government: "Cryptocurrencies are too risky." Also government: "Buy lottery tickets." (1296 points, 139 comments)
    2. Death of a Scamcoin: Bitconnect's front page screenshotted moments before they went private, showing panic, anger, and lots of ill-advised investment claims, several claiming to have lost over $100k (948 points, 309 comments)
    3. Let's End the War and focus on the TRUE ENEMY (730 points, 349 comments)
    4. Archive.org has received over twice as many donations ($4800) in Bitcoincash as compared to BTC. This is how we win. (552 points, 157 comments)
    5. Segwhat? Gavin Andresen has developed a new block propagation algorithm able to compress the block down to 1/10th of the size of a Compact Block (Core's technology) using bloom filters called GRAPHENE. 10 times larger blocks, no size increase! 1mb 10mb, 8mb - 80mb, etc. (413 points, 181 comments)
    6. Remember Ross Ulbricht: Dread Pirate Roberts and the Silk Road experiment (400 points, 217 comments)
  20. 3746 points, 8 submissions: knight222
    1. PSA: /bitcoin IS UNDER ATTACK (761 points, 260 comments)
    2. /btc is trending! (528 points, 63 comments)
    3. Bitstamp To Launch Bitcoin Cash Trading (487 points, 80 comments)
    4. Mycelium.com on Twitter: "We support whatever will allow bitcoin to remain censorship resistant. For now that's only possible with bigger blocks." (442 points, 39 comments)
    5. CBS is referring the new chain as "Bitcoin Cash" and the old chain as "Bitcoin Classic". Ahah (421 points, 121 comments)
    6. Bitcoin cash (BCH) price could lead to bitcoin "death spiral" - Quartz (375 points, 55 comments)
    7. Bitcoin Cash just destroyed the narrative of a contentious hard fork. There is nothing contentious with free choice. (369 points, 114 comments)
    8. Bitcoin Cash support expected in the next Mycelium release! (363 points, 84 comments)
  21. 3550 points, 6 submissions: singularity87
    1. I am stepping down as a moderator of btc and exiting the bitcoin community and entering the Ethereum community. (1110 points, 482 comments)
    2. Now that the debate is over, lets finally make some progress forward. We are starting a marketing fund to expand Bitcoin Cash adoption. (722 points, 211 comments)
    3. Bitcoin Cash Logo Animation GIF. Feel free to use. (562 points, 83 comments)
    4. The entire bitcoin economy is attacking bitcoin says bitcoin.org! You can't make this shit up. (440 points, 270 comments)
    5. Now that REAL consensus is forming, be ready for Core to offer a 2MB hardfork as a last ditch effort to retain their power. DO NOT GIVE IN! (363 points, 179 comments)
    6. btc now has ~50% of the active users of Bitcoin. At this rate btc will soon be the dominant bitcoin subreddit. (353 points, 55 comments)

Top Commenters

  1. jessquit (17415 points, 1759 comments)
  2. H0dl (8425 points, 1127 comments)
  3. knight222 (7888 points, 810 comments)
  4. ForkiusMaximus (7755 points, 700 comments)
  5. MemoryDealers (7539 points, 197 comments)
  6. tippr (7348 points, 2740 comments)
  7. Ant-n (7224 points, 965 comments)
  8. BeijingBitcoins (6072 points, 459 comments)
  9. BitcoinXio (5984 points, 320 comments)
  10. BitcoinIsTehFuture (5845 points, 516 comments)
  11. imaginary_username (5762 points, 471 comments)
  12. Adrian-X (5748 points, 1069 comments)
  13. LexGrom (5224 points, 1592 comments)
  14. cryptorebel (4869 points, 464 comments)
  15. Egon_1 (4769 points, 368 comments)
  16. awemany (4738 points, 643 comments)
  17. Kain_niaK (4561 points, 692 comments)
  18. BitttBurger (4410 points, 525 comments)
  19. PsyRev_ (4176 points, 477 comments)
  20. Bitcoinopoly (4002 points, 414 comments)
  21. poorbrokebastard (3986 points, 719 comments)
  22. vbuterin (3840 points, 22 comments)
  23. Shock_The_Stream (3769 points, 437 comments)
  24. todu (3692 points, 266 comments)
  25. Richy_T (3626 points, 847 comments)
  26. LovelyDay (3595 points, 332 comments)
  27. shadowofashadow (3498 points, 383 comments)
  28. rdar1999 (3475 points, 456 comments)
  29. btcnewsupdates (3403 points, 328 comments)
  30. KoKansei (3286 points, 198 comments)
  31. jonald_fyookball (3219 points, 251 comments)
  32. 1s44c (3186 points, 619 comments)
  33. nanoakron (2989 points, 113 comments)
  34. NilacTheGrim (2925 points, 440 comments)
  35. singularity87 (2746 points, 240 comments)
  36. Vibr8gKiwi (2594 points, 148 comments)
  37. jstolfi (2541 points, 263 comments)
  38. esquonk (2532 points, 2 comments)
  39. fiah84 (2496 points, 289 comments)
  40. unitedstatian (2445 points, 451 comments)
  41. MobTwo (2372 points, 147 comments)
  42. chernobyl169 (2353 points, 199 comments)
  43. kairepaire (2280 points, 17 comments)
  44. ShadowOfHarbringer (2272 points, 206 comments)
  45. playfulexistence (2241 points, 99 comments)
  46. LiamGaughan (2240 points, 83 comments)
  47. redlightsaber (2238 points, 328 comments)
  48. we-are-all-satoshi (2201 points, 39 comments)
  49. Annapurna317 (2198 points, 223 comments)
  50. MagicalTux (2153 points, 114 comments)

Top Submissions

  1. Evidence that the mods of /Bitcoin may have been involved with the hacking and vote manipulation "attack" on /Bitcoin. by censorship_notifier (8585 points, 1166 comments)
  2. The idiocracy of bitcoin by PedanticPendant (7772 points, 750 comments)
  3. As of today, Steam will no longer support Bitcoin as a payment method by boomtnt46 (6980 points, 1178 comments)
  4. Buy, sell, send and receive Bitcoin Cash on Coinbase by 11111101000 (5329 points, 1019 comments)
  5. bitcoin mods removed top post: "The rich don't need Bitcoin. The poor do" by Egon_1 (4810 points, 506 comments)
  6. Guess who controls over half a billion Tethers across 3 exchanges—over 73% of USDT currently in circulation. by peptocurrency (4748 points, 635 comments)
  7. Average Bitcoin transaction fee is now above five dollars. 80% of the world population lives on less than $10 a day. So much for "banking the unbanked." by BeijingBitcoins (3417 points, 463 comments)
  8. Latest projections show BTC will break the time space continuum by cryptopicker (3292 points, 146 comments)
  9. Two biggest Bitcoin subs according to their counterparts (posted on both subs) by themetalfriend (3135 points, 232 comments)
  10. rBitcoin logic: Cashing out? You should kill yourself instead by DrunkPanda (2918 points, 560 comments)

Top Comments

  1. 2527 points: esquonk's comment in As of today, Steam will no longer support Bitcoin as a payment method
  2. 2289 points: nanoakron's comment in Evidence that the mods of /Bitcoin may have been involved with the hacking and vote manipulation "attack" on /Bitcoin.
  3. 2025 points: kairepaire's comment in As of today, Steam will no longer support Bitcoin as a payment method
  4. 2018 points: vbuterin's comment in "So no worries, Ethereum's long term value is still ~0." -Greg Maxwell, CTO of Blockstream and opponent of allowing Bitcoin to scale as Satoshi had planned.
  5. 1215 points: vbuterin's comment in Vitalik Buterin tried to develop Ethereum on top of Bitcoin, but was stalled because the developers made it hard to build on top of Bitcoin. Vitalik only then built Ethereum as a separate currency
  6. 1211 points: LiamGaughan's comment in As of today, Steam will no longer support Bitcoin as a payment method
  7. 1184 points: anothertimewaster's comment in Evidence that the mods of /Bitcoin may have been involved with the hacking and vote manipulation "attack" on /Bitcoin.
  8. 1180 points: TacoPi's comment in Buy, sell, send and receive Bitcoin Cash on Coinbase
  9. 962 points: insanityzwolf's comment in bitcoin mods removed top post: "The rich don't need Bitcoin. The poor do"
  10. 868 points: SethEllis's comment in As of today, Steam will no longer support Bitcoin as a payment method
Generated with BBoe's Subreddit Stats
submitted by subreddit_stats to subreddit_stats [link] [comments]

LET'S TALK ABOUT THE BITCOIN HALVING!! REAL TALK.. BITCOIN, LITECOIN, ETHEREUM, DIGIBYTE UPDATE!! Ethereum to Outperform Bitcoin in Next Two Months? Let's talk ETH/BTC Lets Talk About Bitcoin & Cryptocurrency In 2020 Let's Talk ETC! (Ethereum Classic) #21 - Anthony (Pyskell) - Security & More ETHEREUM *HARD FORK* COMING!

If Let’s Talk Bitcoin! Were on Youtube, we wouldn’t be able to say the word Covid-19. Avoiding totalitarian controls means missing opportunities presented by big would-be platforms. Let's Talk Bitcoin! POV Crypto; Proof of Love; SAFE Crossroads; The Tatiana Moroz Show; What Bitcoin Did; History. The LTB Network; About. Community Directory; Terms and Conditions ; Contact Us; RSS; Sort By. Newest; Oldest; Top; From the Front Page - 4 Minute Crypto. 0 Comments 3,545 views. Categories: New Shows, 4 Minute Crypto. 4 Minute Crypto - 20% of Young Adults Now Own Bitcoin. May 3rd ... Listen to Let’s Talk Bitcoin Podcast on Spotify #4. Untold Stories . Charlie Shrem is an American entrepreneur, a Bitcoin enthusiast, and a person of a difficult fate. He founded the BitInstant exchange and was also one of the founders of the Bitcoin Foundation. In 2014, he was sentenced for two years in prison for money laundering through the Darknet platform Silk Road. In prison, he did ... The Bitcoin.com Mint gives anyone the ability to mint their own customized SLP tokens in less than a minute after they add a tiny fraction of BCH. Let's take a look ... Matthew Beedham ... The arrested Ethereum dev will be released from prison pending trial after a judge ruled there was enough evidence to move ... Yessi Bello Perez ; 5 times ...

[index] [35117] [9911] [35101] [11483] [21833] [1398] [7898] [11358] [14487] [4739]

LET'S TALK ABOUT THE BITCOIN HALVING!! REAL TALK.. BITCOIN, LITECOIN, ETHEREUM, DIGIBYTE UPDATE!!

Sunday Night Requests - Let's talk Bitcoin, Litecoin, Ethereum, and chart you want to see - Duration: 1:45:36. Jim of All Trades 304 views. 1:45:36. LIVE BITCOIN ANALYSIS - Sunday Night Chart ... Let's Talk ETC! provides timely news about ETC (Ethereum Classic) and related technologies including: Ethereum, Bitcoin, blockchains and more. Feel free to leave requests, questions and comments ... Skip navigation Sign in. Search Let's Talk ETC! provides timely news about ETC (Ethereum Classic) and related technologies including: Ethereum, Bitcoin, blockchains and more. Feel free to leave requests, questions and comments ... LET'S TALK ABOUT THE BITCOIN HALVING!! REAL TALK.. BITCOIN, LITECOIN, ETHEREUM, DIGIBYTE UPDATE!! Not Financial Advice! Entertainment only! BTC Address for those who want to support my work ...

#